Home

Blog

How People Voted

22% For, 78% Against
44 votes cast

H.R. 5325, The Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2013

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on May 3, 2012, 06:30:12 (webmaster):

Making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2013.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
(Log in to editLatest Major Action: 5/2/2012: Placed on the wiki and be the first to update the status of the bill!)Union Calendar, Calendar No. 323.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Costs: $389.60 per
and increases their $162,301.27 share of the national debt by $389.60.
(source: Committee Report)

From the Blog

And They’re Off! FY 2013 Spending

Spending season kicks into full gear this week. The House will debate H.R. 5326, which spends money on the operation of the Departments of Commerce and Justice, and on science-related programs. That spending, for fiscal year 2013, adds up to a little o...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – June 4, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of June 3, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Foreign Affairs Spending With spending bills on the subject moving in th...

It’s All About the Spending

This week, the House puts behind last weeks’ Obamacare drama, and turns back to the annual spending process. Spending. Each year, Congress spends enough to buy each family in the United States a new car. And most people don’t pay attention ...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Carol Taylor

June 4, 2012, 1:01pm (report abuse)

This bill is pure pork. The Title is misleading as it is mainly about financing pensions & things covered by other bills. Try cutting back Washington as all of the people have had to do to get by. Everything is costing more. Cut out the overspending.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)