How People Voted
70% For, 30% Against
17 votes cast
Take Action
 |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
 |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Organize | |
|
Start A Petition |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 3262, The Government Results Transparency Act
- This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Costs: $ per
and increases their $ share of the national debt by $.
(source: Congressional Budget Office)
Learn More
Visitor Comments
cubapete
(logged-in user) February 27, 2012, 11:19am (report abuse)The bill should not include caveats for "non-proprietary" formats. All information must be presented in a format generally accessible by the public. The bill should be re-written without this language.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
Transparency, Yes!
The introduction of a new transparency bill in Congress (H.R. 3262) is a nice reminder of our petition favoring an orderly and transparent Congress. That petition doesn’t have the signatures it needs yet. Have you signed? When there are enough pe...WashingtonWatch.com Digest – February 26, 2012
This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of February 27, 2012. Subscribe here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Transportation Spending Federal transportation spending hasn’t gone t...