Home

Blog

H.R. 3261, The Stop Online Piracy Act

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on November 3, 2011, 06:30:49 (webmaster), with revision saved on December 17, 2011, 06:33:52 (webmaster):

H.R. 3261 would promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 11/2/2011: Referred to12/16/2011: House subcommittee.committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, CompetitionCommittee Consideration and the Internet.Mark-up Session Held.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.

Learn More

    Costs: $0.37 per
    and increases their $162,301.27 share of the national debt by $0.37.
    (source info)

  • Read the Bill
  • See What People Are Saying

To What Comittee was this Bill Referred?

From the Blog

The Internet (Community) Fights Back

While Congress has been out of town, the Internet community has been fighting back against legislation that would tinker with the workings of the greatest communications network ever. The bill is intended to control copyright, which is indeed commonpla...

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – January 23, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of January 23, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: Where the Action Is If you’re a budget wonk, you want to pay a...

Techland on SOPA/PIPA

Time’s Techland blogger Jerry Brito links to WashingtonWatch.com in his story about the recent SOPA/PIPA revolution: “Why We Won’t See Many Protests like the SOPA Blackout.” The bill that caught his eye? The Interagency Personnel Rota....

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Patriots

(logged-in user) November 21, 2011, 10:17pm (report abuse)

So where are all the Cato people commenting on this blatant violation of the first amendment?

LT1

November 21, 2011, 10:49pm (report abuse)

Good question.

Reading the bill does not sound like what it says at the top of this page by any means!

LT1

November 21, 2011, 11:01pm (report abuse)

Perhaps Jim Harper, Director of Information Policy Studies at the Cato Institute, can post a blog article here as to what the true meanings of this bill are concerning civil liberties as described by the Cato institute?

LT1

November 21, 2011, 11:03pm (report abuse)

Jim Harper is the webmaster of this web-site.

CalifGirl

(logged-in user) November 22, 2011, 1:22pm (report abuse)

ummmmm

well, looky, looky who is in here ;)

Patriots

(logged-in user) December 18, 2011, 8:17pm (report abuse)

Wrapping Up a Week Of Action Against SOPA

Yesterday and today, the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee has hunkered down in the Capitol for markup sessions of SOPA, the Stop Online Piracy Act. The basic facts looked bleak: this Internet blacklist bill is a disaster that stands at odds with the Constitution, but the deep pockets of its legacy media backers managed to make it enough friends in committee that its quick passage seemed possible. Judiciary Committee Chairman, author of the bill, and “Hollywood’s Favorite Republican” Lamar Smith scheduled just a single hearing, stacked the deck in his bill’s favor, and rushed it through to markup now, at the end of the legislative session.

But then a funny thing happened: the Internet fought back…

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/…pping-week-action-against-sopa

CalifGirl

(logged-in user) January 17, 2012, 11:33am (report abuse)

The major news outlets have been very spare with their reporting on this issue—while their parent companies lobby for SOPA and PIPA.

http://www.washingtonwatch.com…nternet-community-fights-back/

Bennette

January 18, 2012, 11:55am (report abuse)

REALLY - we already have a court system in place to handle copyright violations, this legislation would just make it easier and less costly for companies to protect their products without inventing their own methods for doing so. Our government should STAY OUT of this problem and leave it in the courts as it always has been so that each SUSPECTED violation is addressed individually. To do otherwise is to ask for extreme abuse and an even high incidence of censorship! LEAVE WHAT FEW TRUE FREEDOMS AND RIGHTS WE HAVE LEFT, ALONE!

CalifGirl

(logged-in user) January 20, 2012, 9:29pm (report abuse)

How People And Social Media Changed Lawmakers' Minds

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/…l7%7Csec3_lnk1%26pLid%3D129136

CalifGirl

(logged-in user) January 21, 2012, 9:47pm (report abuse)

Following a day of unprecedented online protest, the web censorship bills in Congress, SOPA and PIPA, have officially been tabled. “In light of recent events, I have decided to postpone Tuesday’s vote on the PROTECT I.P. Act (PIPA)," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced this morning.

http://www.opencongress.org/

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)