Home

Blog

How People Voted

47% For, 53% Against
19 votes cast

H. Con. Res. 112, Establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2013 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2014 through 2022

  • This item is from the 112th Congress (2011-2012) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Version saved on April 17, 2012, 07:25:12, by webmaster:

Establishing the budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2013 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2014 through 2022.

Detailed Summary

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 4/16/2012: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 354.

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

« Return to Revision History.



Learn More

From the Blog

WashingtonWatch.com Digest – March 26, 2012

This is the WashingtonWatch.com email newsletter for the week of March 26, 2012. Subscribe (free!) here. email newsletter | tell a friend | wiki | about | home | log in On the Blog: The House Budget Fiscal year 2013 starts at the beginning of October, ...

Congress on a Break, Budget Work Not Done

Congress is taking a two-week spring break. It will return to work on April 16th. That’s the day after tax day! It’s also the day after Congress is supposed to finish work on the budget resolution for fiscal year 2013. So far, the House has...

The House Budget—Simplified

The House budget resolution has been introduced and it’s on the House’s docket for this coming week. So we’ve simplified it for you here. That ain’t too hard. The first section of the bill has the most important stuff. The plan ...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

J. Guidry

March 26, 2012, 10:54am (report abuse)

I want a balanced budget. I can't run my house on a deficit budget, why should the government be able to do it? Better than a balanced budget would be one where the "baseline" method is not used and the feds limit their spending to what is coming in, or less. Makes no sense to me, never has.

M McAleer

March 26, 2012, 6:01pm (report abuse)

Anything less than ending the federal reserve banking system and prosecuting the liars who lied this nation to war in Iraq and Afghanistan, Libya, and soon Iran, or Syria, is a waste of time. This government is corrupt from the county level to the very top at the white house. Ron Paul 2012

RHytonen

March 29, 2012, 5:34pm (report abuse)

Because you can NOT "run a country like a business" - OR a household.

The goals are TOTALLY different as are the expenditures, inherited and not, and the consequences of not paying them.

Government is an agreement of people to pool ther money nd choose people to decide how to spend it in the best interests of ALL - or a majority, but certainly not EVER those of a powerful (=rich) few. They can not only take care of themselves, but are disposed BY DEFINITION to predation on the many.

Thus government exists to protect the INDIVIDUAL against business and should never -EVER- help, consider, or even consider input from, business.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)