What People Think
73% For, 27% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
![]() ![]() |
For |
![]() ![]() |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
![]() ![]() |
Comment on this Bill |
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
S. 960, The Medicare Early Access Act of 2009
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)











Visitor Comments
Debbie
May 13, 2009, 5:51pm (report abuse)This is a great bill and will help people 55-65 tremendously!
Rodney Hytonen
July 2, 2009, 1:26pm (report abuse)"would amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a refundable and advanceable credit against income tax for payment of such premiums."
Retired seniors on Social Security ALONE would seem the intended (and most needy) recipients of this bill.
HOWEVER, few to none of them (us) make any money and pay income taxes - so the provision is worse than disingenuous as a benefit, because it helps only those who need it less.
Ho will a senior couple living on less than $1000 per month, too old to get work in the area, and already saddled with doubling utility rates, unable even to afford a doctor's visit when in pain, pay the "premium" for even Medicare?