Home

Blog

How People Voted

52% For, 48% Against
23 votes cast

H.R. 2503, To amend title 49, United States Code, to require inclusion on the no fly list certain detainees housed at the Naval Air Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba

  • This item is from the 111th Congress (2009-2010) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Version saved on May 20, 2009, 07:30:07, by webmaster:

H.R. 2503 would amend title 49, United States Code, to require inclusion on the no fly list certain detainees housed at the Naval Air Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Detailed Summary

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)

Status of the Legislation

Latest Major Action: 5/19/2009: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Points in Favor

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)

Points Against

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)

« Return to Revision History.



Cost per :

From the Blog

The Cruelest Torture for Guantanamo Detainees

The torture debate has taken a new twist. A bill introduced in Congress yesterday would subject Guantanamo detainees to one of the cruelest tortures known to man. Nobody should suffer a fate like this, but the bill does have a chance of passing. H.R. 2...

Congress: Guantanamo No-Fly

In a recent post that was meant to be funny, I noted the proposal to put Guantanamo detainees on the no-fly list. Wrecking people’s day at the airport, the cruelest torture. Get it? Oh well. Anyway, that proposal - to put former detainees at Gua...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Lance

May 21, 2009, 6:00pm (report abuse)

You mean to tell me there are 2 year olds being included on the no-fly list but Guantanamo detainees are not? I find that hard to believe...

K. Cosenza

May 24, 2009, 10:59am (report abuse)

Keep them in prison! When I take a flight it is usually for a vacation. Why, in God's earth is this even being considered? Oh, or maybe they can catch a flight with Nancy? Thus, saving taxpayers some money.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)