Home

Blog

What People Think

17% For, 83% Against

Take Action

Vote on this Bill
For
Against
Speak Out
Comment on this Bill
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 493, The California Wild Heritage Act of 2007

Revision History Revisions Feed for This Bill

Below is the revision history of this article.

(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)

No revisions found.


Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Larry Kueneman

It would be one thing to declare a specific area a wilderness, yet the intention of this bill is stated to preserve the "wilderness character of the area. The wilderness character of most of the forested areas so designated was lost several hundred years ago. Should the writers care to thin the forest from it's present 400 to 2,000 trees per acre back to the historic 40 to 60 trees per acre, I might agree. At today's greater number of trees sunlight is restricted on both the ground and the sides of the crowns of the trees. A long story short, this means that habitat is severely diminished. This is specifically why the ESA was needed.

Reagan Slee

When will people stop believing everything see on TV or in a Book? These lands are already protected and governed by the federal government. This is bill is written because Boxer’s ego wants to one up Feinstein’s. I was born and raised where this proposed wilderness is taking place and I have seen the land improve in the last 10 years but I have seen places that are labeled wilderness decrease too. People are such sheep and have ruined places because they labeled it. Listen to people they don’t want to go on a hike to someplace nobodies herd of they want to be an elitist and boost their egos with bragging to friends that they went to the blab blab wilderness over the summer. If you want to keep the land the way it is the government needs to have drastic enforcement. If somebody drives where they are not supposed to give them a $25,000 fine and take their vehicle. I am 100% opposed to this bill.

Add Comment

Number of characters:

Comments are limited to 1,000 characters. Please do other visitors the courtesy of expressing yourself concisely. WashingtonWatch.com bears no responsibility for comments nor any obligation to publish them. Comments that are impolite, off-topic, violations of others' rights, or advertisements are likely to be removed.

 
(To request new code, make a copy of your comment and hit "Refresh" in your browser.)

Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_SN_493.html

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)