See Related Bills:
See Bills on the Same Subject:
Agriculture, Air routes, Animals, Armed forces, Boats and boating, Boundaries, Budgets, Business, California, Civil liberties, Commemorations, Community development, Congress, Congressional reporting requirements, Criminal justice, Defense policy, Delegation of powers, Emergency management, Endangered species, Environmental law enforcement, Environmental protection, Federal aid to law enforcement, Federal-Indian relations, Federal-local relations, Federal-state relations, Fire prevention, Fishery management, Fishing, Forest conservation, Forest fires, Government information, Government publicity, Governmental investigations, Grants-in-aid, Grazing, Habitat conservation, Horses, Hunting, Indians, Islands, Job creation, Land transfers, Landowners, Law enforcement, Maps, Marine resources, Military aviation, Minorities, Motor vehicles, National forests, National monuments, National parks, National recreation areas, Natural areas, Natural monuments, Natural resources, Old growth forests, Outdoor recreation, Planning, Public buildings, Public lands, Religion, Restoration ecology, Right of property, Roads and highways, Salmon, Sports, State and local government, Tourism, Trails, Transportation, Water resources, Water resources development, Wild rivers, Wilderness areas, Wildlife conservation, Wildlife management (more subjects ↓)
See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
N/A
Visitor Comments
Larry Kueneman
It would be one thing to declare a specific area a wilderness, yet the intention of this bill is stated to preserve the "wilderness character of the area. The wilderness character of most of the forested areas so designated was lost several hundred years ago. Should the writers care to thin the forest from it's present 400 to 2,000 trees per acre back to the historic 40 to 60 trees per acre, I might agree. At today's greater number of trees sunlight is restricted on both the ground and the sides of the crowns of the trees. A long story short, this means that habitat is severely diminished. This is specifically why the ESA was needed.
Reagan Slee
When will people stop believing everything see on TV or in a Book? These lands are already protected and governed by the federal government. This is bill is written because Boxer’s ego wants to one up Feinstein’s. I was born and raised where this proposed wilderness is taking place and I have seen the land improve in the last 10 years but I have seen places that are labeled wilderness decrease too. People are such sheep and have ruined places because they labeled it. Listen to people they don’t want to go on a hike to someplace nobodies herd of they want to be an elitist and boost their egos with bragging to friends that they went to the blab blab wilderness over the summer. If you want to keep the land the way it is the government needs to have drastic enforcement. If somebody drives where they are not supposed to give them a $25,000 fine and take their vehicle. I am 100% opposed to this bill.