How People Voted
 |
 |
36% For, 64% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
P.L. 110-402, A bill to extend the authority of the United States Supreme Court Police to protect court officials off the Supreme Court Grounds and change the title of the Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on September 15, 2008, 20:09:02 (webmaster), with revision saved on September 26, 2008, 11:10:57 (webmaster):
S. 3296 would extend the authority of the United States Supreme Court Police to protect court officials off the Supreme Court Grounds and change the title of the Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
Extends through calendar year 2013 the authority of the United States Supreme Court Police to protect court officials off the Supreme Court grounds.
Changes the title of the Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice to Counselor to the Chief Justice.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 9/11/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 956.9/25/2008: Held at the desk.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Cost per :
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the House.
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
From the Blog
Silly Season, Part IV
Monday was another day with a cavalcade of bills streaming through the House of Representatives. While you were watching the bailout (just at the moment I’m posting this, the House is debating the rule that would govern its debate on the Senate-p...Swarm II: The Lawmaking Continues
The “swarm” of new laws featured earlier this week has grown. Below are the latest new laws to go on the books, hurried through Congress at the end of the regular session. Most of them have received a cost estimate, and they add up to abou...