Home

Blog

How People Voted

27% For, 73% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 2850, The Illegal Garnishment Prevention Act

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on April 23, 2008, 20:00:43 (webmaster):

S. 2850 would prohibit the use of funds to promote the direct deposit of Social Security benefits until adequate safeguards are established to prevent the attachment and garnishment of such benefits.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log inProhibits funds appropriated or otherwise made available to edit the wikiSecretary of the Treasury or the Commissioner of Social Security for FY 2009 from being used to promote or otherwise encourage recipients of benefits paid under title II (Old Age, Survivors and beDisability Insurance) (OASDI) of the firstSocial Security Act to provide a detailed summaryuse direct deposit for the payment of such benefits until: (1) the bill!)Secretary promulgates rules establishing procedures to ensure that such benefits are protected from attachment and garnishment; and (2) at least five of the seven members of the advisory committee established under this Act concur in advising the Secretary that such procedures provide adequate safeguards.

Establishes a Social Security Benefits Protection from Attachment or Garnishment Advisory Committee.

</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
(Log inLatest Major Action: 4/14/2008: Referred to edit the wikiSenate committee. Status: Read twice and be the firstreferred to update the status of the bill!)Committee on Finance.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Charles

December 1, 2008, 3:33am (report abuse)

I think this bill should pass. I am disabilied and receive direct deposit of my funds. This year alone, my bank account has been frozen for debts occured before I became disabled and have been unable to satisfy. Please past this bill. The collection activities of many collection agencies have gotten out of hand. It is not unusual for my account to become restricted without any prior notice of any kind. Please, please pass this bill. So many of us need it...desperately.

DV

December 25, 2008, 10:06pm (report abuse)

I'm not on social security, it doesn't matter what age you are my bank froze my account 2 days before Christmas and gave $3500 to my creditor leaving me penniless to buy food for my family. This is all over a credit card swiping machine. Is it worth me losing my home, getting my lights turned off with my heat. My bank, Bank Of America set me up real nice, these are the actions of a dictatorship when you can freeze a persons way of survival for a credit card machine. We are not this hard on did beat dads that won't care for another human being. The punishment doesn't fit the situation. Let's ban against this mess DELVAR@DELVARSL.COM

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)