How People Voted
38% For, 62% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
S. 2844, The Beach Protection Act of 2008
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on July 11, 2008, 20:05:16 (webmaster), with revision saved on October 9, 2008, 20:08:49 (webmaster):
S. 2844 would amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to modify provisions relating to beach monitoring.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
Beach Protection Act of 2008 - (Sec. 2) Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (popularly(commonly known as the Clean Water Act) to include among eligible grant activities the development and implementation of programs for source tracking, sanitary surveys, and prevention efforts to address the identified sources of beach water pollution. Authorizes appropriations for such grants for FY2008-FY2013.
Requires grant recipients to identify: (1)(Sec. 3) Amends the use of a rapid testing method; (2) measures for communication within 24 hours of the results of a water sample concerning pollutants to specified officialsBeaches Environmental Assessment and all state agencies with authority to require the prevention or treatmentCoastal Health Act of the sources of beach water pollution; (3) measures2000 to develop and implement a beach water pollution source identification and tracking program for the coastal recreation waters that are not meeting applicable water quality standards for pathogens; (4) a publicly accessible and searchable global information system database with information updated within 24 hours of its availability, organized by beach and with defined standards, sampling plan, monitoring protocols, sampling results, and number and cause of beach closing and advisory days; and (5) measuresauthorize appropriations to ensure that closures or advisories are made or issued within 24 hours after a state government determines that its coastal recreation waters are not meeting applicable water quality standards for pathogens. carry out such Act through FY2013.
Requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator to:(Sec. 5) Requires grant recipients to identify: (1) publish a revised listthe use of a rapid testing methods; andmethod; (2) validate such methods no later than two years after this Act's enactmentmeasures for communication within 24 hours of the results of a water sample concerning pollutants to specified officials and periodically thereafter. all state agencies with authority to require the prevention or treatment of the sources of beach water pollution; (3) measures to develop and implement a beach water pollution source identification and tracking program for the coastal recreation waters that are not meeting applicable water quality standards for pathogens; (4) a publicly accessible and searchable global information system database with information updated within 24 hours of its availability, organized by beach and with defined standards, sampling plan, monitoring protocols, sampling results, and number and cause of beach closing and advisory days; and (5) measures to ensure that closures or advisories are made or issued within 24 hours after a state government determines that its coastal recreation waters are not meeting applicable water quality standards for pathogens.
Sets forth provisions requiring:Requires the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator to: (1) publish a review by the Administratorrevised list of staterapid testing methods; and local compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements and grant conditions; (2) corrective actions by such governments not in compliance; and (3) a review by the Comptroller Generalvalidate such compliance reviewmethods no later than two years after this Act's enactment and corrective action. periodically thereafter.
Amends(Sec. 8) Sets forth provisions requiring: (1) a review by the Beaches Environmental AssessmentAdministrator of state and Coastal Health Actlocal compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements and grant conditions, including compliance with public health and safety performance criteria and state and local program content requirements; (2) corrective actions by such governments not in compliance; and (3) a review by the Comptroller General of 2000such compliance review and corrective action.
(Sec. 9) Directs the Administrator to authorize appropriationsstudy and report to carry out suchCongress on the formula for the distribution of grants for coastal recreation water quality monitoring under the Clean Water Act through FY2013.for the purpose of identifying potential revisions of that formula. Requires the Administrator to consider the emphasis and valuation placed on the length of beach season and to revise the distribution formula in accordance with the study's recommendations.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 7/10/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 871.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Cost per :
Learn More
Visitor Comments 
Josh
May 21, 2008, 2:34am (report abuse)Finally, this bill should help our beaches keep clean. I hope this bill should put a hefty fine and indefinite prisonment for those who pollute our beaches.
For liberty
July 28, 2008, 2:19pm (report abuse)Why should inland states support beach water quality monitoring efforts of coastal states? Why don't the coastal states pay for this themselves rather than using federal tax dollars? I don't see anything in the constitution that authorizes this action by the federal government. This is a power grab by the federal government.
Californian
August 11, 2008, 2:31pm (report abuse)In response to For liberty's comment, why should western coastal states pay for hurricane or tornado disaster response for those states who happen to lie in the paths of natural disasters? Why don't the affected states pay for this themselves rather than using federal tax dollars? I don't see anything in the constitution that authorizes this action by the federal government. This is a power grab by the federal government. Let the hurrican and tornado ravaged states pay for their recovery by themselves. Otherwise we'll just further the welfare state that I'm sure you fear. That is except when you need the money from the coastal states unaffected by your disasters to pay for your reconstruction.
Seattle
August 29, 2008, 2:46am (report abuse)The beach could be in any state..with lakes and rivers too.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




From the Blog
The “Coburn Omnibus” - 36 Bills in One!
Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma didn’t come to Washington, D.C. to grow the government. A long time critic of federal spending and power, he has made prolific use of “holds” to prevent legislation he doesn’t like fr...