Home

Blog

How People Voted

38% For, 62% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 2844, The Beach Protection Act of 2008

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Revision History Revisions Feed for This Bill

Below is the revision history of this article.

(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)

(Latest | Earliest)

To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).


Cost per :

From the Blog

The “Coburn Omnibus” - 36 Bills in One!

Republican Senator Tom Coburn of Oklahoma didn’t come to Washington, D.C. to grow the government. A long time critic of federal spending and power, he has made prolific use of “holds” to prevent legislation he doesn’t like fr...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Josh

May 21, 2008, 2:34am (report abuse)

Finally, this bill should help our beaches keep clean. I hope this bill should put a hefty fine and indefinite prisonment for those who pollute our beaches.

For liberty

July 28, 2008, 2:19pm (report abuse)

Why should inland states support beach water quality monitoring efforts of coastal states? Why don't the coastal states pay for this themselves rather than using federal tax dollars? I don't see anything in the constitution that authorizes this action by the federal government. This is a power grab by the federal government.

Californian

August 11, 2008, 2:31pm (report abuse)

In response to For liberty's comment, why should western coastal states pay for hurricane or tornado disaster response for those states who happen to lie in the paths of natural disasters? Why don't the affected states pay for this themselves rather than using federal tax dollars? I don't see anything in the constitution that authorizes this action by the federal government. This is a power grab by the federal government. Let the hurrican and tornado ravaged states pay for their recovery by themselves. Otherwise we'll just further the welfare state that I'm sure you fear. That is except when you need the money from the coastal states unaffected by your disasters to pay for your reconstruction.

Seattle

August 29, 2008, 2:46am (report abuse)

The beach could be in any state..with lakes and rivers too.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)