Home

Blog

How People Voted

19% For, 81% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 2774, The Federal Judgeship Act of 2008

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on March 17, 2008, 10:47:14 (webmaster), with revision saved on September 11, 2008, 10:47:59 (webmaster):

S. 2774 would provide for the appointment of additional Federal circuit and district judges.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to edit<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)</b>

Federal Judgeship Act of 2008 - Directs
the wiki and bePresident to: (1) appoint additional circuit judges for the first to provide a detailed summaryfirst, second, third, sixth, eighth, and ninth circuit courts of appeals and temporary judges for the bill!)ninth circuit court of appeals; and (2) appoint additional permanent and temporary district judges for districts in specified states.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 3/13/2008: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee7/21/2008: Placed on the Judiciary.Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 891.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

jeff

June 23, 2008, 9:38pm (report abuse)

the last thing we need is adding to an already too large of a government.if the currently residing judges actually worked a 40 hr week,the back log of cases would be reduced.if anything we need to take steps to expedite the petty charges that are backing up the system!

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)