What People Think
 |
 |
23% For, 77% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
  |
For |
  |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
  |
Comment on this Bill |
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
S. 2682, The United Nations Population Fund Restoration Act of 2008
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_SN_2682.html
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Ed Canell
If the bill does what it is intended for and not a superfund for servicing abortions alone, I agree with the passage. No additional tax monies should come from the taxpayers of the United States. Move what monies we already give to the UN for the purpose of taking care of this critically needed bill...ED
db
could abortion be considered a "contraceptive"?
could "maternal health services" include abortion?
abortion is not mentioned...is it intended?
Joyce
Why should my tax dollars go to fund abortions in China?