How People Voted
 |
 |
24% For, 76% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
S. 2577, The Gun Show Background Check Act of 2008
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on March 14, 2008, 04:05:33 (webmaster):
S. 2577 would establish background check procedures for gun shows.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
(Log inLatest Major Action: 1/30/2008: Referred to edit the wikiSenate committee. Status: Read twice and be the firstreferred to update the status ofCommittee on the bill!)Judiciary.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
kbobkat1
April 21, 2008, 11:18pm (report abuse)so now the govt is figuring another way to take more money out of our pockets. Take one of the "rights" the right to bear arms, and tax it, still w/out any noticeable representation.
Ivan
April 23, 2008, 1:57pm (report abuse)So if we are to believe the Second Amendment's verbiage, "the right of the people" does not apply to citizens' rights, does that also mean "the right of the people" verbiage in the first and fourth amendments (and elsewhere in the Bill of Rights) also don't apply to citizens' rights?
Our Founding Fathers meant exactly what they wrote in the Constitution and Bill of Rights; with the intent of protecting us from political agendas and petty tyrants/movements.
RecordOnlineGuide.blogspot.com
November 10, 2008, 1:10am (report abuse)criminalsearches is a great site, but I would say still do your other checks on other sites. Some time it doesn’t show the guy I am looking for, and the state has a record for him a mile long. Sometimes it gives me things the state doesn’t, so it is worth using.
webrecordcb
November 10, 2008, 1:11am (report abuse)The Dangers Of Using Public Records,see more :
http://www.scribd.com/doc/7425640/httprecordonlineguideblogspotcom