Home

Blog

How People Voted

20% For, 80% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 2434, The Computer Trespass Clarification Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on December 8, 2007, 18:30:06 (webmaster), with revision saved on January 4, 2008, 18:31:07 (webmaster):

S. 2434 would clarify conditions for the interceptions of computer trespass communications under the USA-PATRIOT Act.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to editComputer Trespass Clarification Act of 2007 - Amends the wiki and befederal criminal code to: (1) exclude from the firstdefinition of &quot;computer trespasser&quot; for purposes of determining the legality of interceptions of computer communications any person who has any relationship with the owner or operator of a protected computer (currently, only persons who have a contractual relationship with the owner or operator of a protected computer are excluded); (2) require the owner or operator of a protected computer to providebe attempting to respond to communications activity that threatens the integrity or operation of such computer before authorizing the interception of a detailed summarycomputer trespasser's communications by a person acting under color of law (e.g., law enforcement officers); and (3) limit the bill!)length of warrantless surveillance of a computer trespasser to the earlier of 96 hours or as soon as communications that are sought are obtained.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)