Home

Blog

How People Voted

29% For, 71% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 2255, The Chisholm Trail and Great Western Trail Studies Act

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on October 30, 2007, 19:47:42 (webmaster), with revision saved on December 24, 2008, 20:10:36 (webmaster):

S. 2255 would amend the National Trails System Act to provide for studies of the Chisholm Trail and Great Western Trail to determine whether to add the trails to the National Trails System.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log inChisholm Trail and Great Western Trail Studies Act - Amends the National Trails System Act to editdirect the wiki and beSecretary of the firstInterior to provide a detailed summaryconduct separate studies to consider the designation of the bill!)Chisholm Trail and the Great Western Trail for study and potential addition to the National Trails System. Requires the Secretary to identify the point at which such Trails originated south of San Antonio, Texas.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 10/29/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee9/16/2008: Placed on Energy and Natural Resources.Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 980.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)