Home

Blog

How People Voted

32% For, 68% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 2024, The Fair and Representative Presidential Primaries Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on September 7, 2007, 19:01:44 (webmaster), with revision saved on March 1, 2008, 12:47:38 (Carl):

S. 2024 would provide for interregional primary elections and caucuses for the selection of delegates to political party Presidential nominating conventions.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and(This text will be automatically replaced if the first to provide a detailedofficial summary ofis transferred from the bill!)
</summary>
legislature.)</summary>

<!--LeaveS. 2024 is known as Fair and Representative Presidential Primaries Act of 2007.

This bill would create an interregional primary system. Six primaries would be held on six specific Tuesdays from March to June. The states would be divided into geographical regions. Each of the primaries would consist of one or more states from every region of the country. A lottery would determine the order of the primaries
in the 'summary' tags if you wantfirst election year. After the latest summaryfirst election year, the sequence would rotate, so that all the states would take turns holding earlier, middle, and later primaries.

Here is how the regions and groups are arranged:

Region 1: (A) Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont; (B) Massachusetts; (C) Connecticut, Rhode Island; (D) Delaware, New Jersey; (E) New York; (F) Pennsylvania.

Region 2: (A) Maryland; (B) West Virginia; (C) Missouri; (D) Indiana; (E) Kentucky; (F) Tennessee.

Region 3: (A) Ohio; (B) Illinois; (C) Michigan; (D) Wisconsin; (E) Iowa; (F) Minnesota.

Region 4: (A) Texas; (B) Louisiana; (C) Arkansas, Oklahoma; (D) Colorado; (E) Kansas, Nebraska; (F) Arizona, New Mexico.

Region 5: (A) Virginia; (B) North Carolina; (C) South Carolina; (D) Florida; (E) Georgia; (F) Mississippi, Alabama.

Region 6: (A) California; (B) Washington; (C) Oregon; (D) Idaho, Nevada, Utah; (E) Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wyoming; (F) Hawaii, Alaska.

The groups
from each of the Congressional Research Service automaticallyregions would remain consistent, so that the Group (A) states would always share the same primary, the Group (B) states would always share the same primary, and so on. When the primary sequence rotated, the groups would rotate together.

For example, if the lottery selected Group (A)
to replacehold the text betweenfirst primary, the states that would participate in that first primary would be Maine, New Hampshire, and Vermont from Region 1, Maryland from Region 2, Ohio from Region 3, Texas from Region 4, Virginia from Region 5, and California from Region 6. The second primary would be the Group (B) states, which would consist of Massachusetts from Region 1, West Virginia from Region 2, Illinois from Region 3, Louisiana from Region 4, North Carolina from Region 5, and Washington from Region 6.

The specific Tuesdays for the six primaries would be 2nd Tuesday in March, 1st and 4th Tuesdays in April, 2nd and 4th Tuesdays in May, and 2nd Tuesday in June. For each election, the groups would rotate through the sequence, so that if Group (A) was first in 2012, they would be last in 2016, 5th in 2020, 4th in 2024, and so on until they were first again in 2036.

The bill also includes rules for
the tags once it becomes available. -->timing of primaries for Washington D.C., Puerto Rico, and other US territories.

(Source: The Library of Congress on Thomas, http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:S.2024: )


== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 9/6/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Carl

March 1, 2008, 11:50am (report abuse)

This is a good reform plan for primary elections. It's not perfect, but it's better than the current "leap-frog" race by the states to hold the earliest primary. It also solves the problem in which Iowa and New Hampshire are first every year.

Please join the discussion at regionalprimary.wordpress.com

-Carl

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)