How People Voted
43% For, 57% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
S. 1694, The Pollinator Protection Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on July 26, 2007, 18:49:08 (webmaster):
S. 1694 would authorize resources for sustained research and analysis to address colony collapse disorder and the decline of North American pollinators.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(LogPollinator Protection Act of 2007 - Authorizes appropriations to the Secretary of Agriculture, through the Agricultural Research Service, for: (1) personnel, facilities improvement, and additional research at Department of Agriculture Bee Research Laboratories; (2) research on honey bee physiology, insect pathology, insect chemical ecology, and honey and native bee toxicology at other Department facilities in New York, Florida, California, Utah, and Texas; and (3) research to editidentify causes and solutions for Colony Collapse Disorder, with specified amounts for research at the wikiAgricultural Research Services in Beltsville, Maryland, and beTucson, Arizona.
Authorizes appropriations to the firstSecretary, through the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, for research grants to provide a detailed summary ofinvestigate: (1) honey bee immunology, genomics, biology, ecology, and bioinformatics; (2) pollination biology; and (3) the bill!)effects of genetically modified crops, insecticides, herbicides, parasites, and fungicides on honey bees and other beneficial insects and pollinators.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
(Log inLatest Major Action: 6/26/2007: Referred to edit the wikiSenate committee. Status: Read twice and be the firstreferred to update the status of the bill!)Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
RG Kinsey
September 25, 2007, 10:44pm (report abuse)Bees should have the same protection as bald eagles. Most people are so far removed from nature, they don't realize how critical bees are, they just want to "get rid of them" like pests. This is ignorance and requires immediate attention. In fact, I doubt most people even realize that bees are a matter of life and death.
arpad
March 24, 2008, 7:42pm (report abuse)I'm currently doing an American Gov. term paper on CCD, and i really think this is an issue that should be addressed by congress, and thus am for the passing of such an act!!