Home

Blog

How People Voted

19% For, 81% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 1667, A bill to establish a pilot program for the expedited disposal of Federal real property

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on October 10, 2007, 19:07:53 (webmaster):

S. 1667 would establish a pilot program for the expedited disposal of Federal real property.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log inRequires the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to editconduct the wikiFederal Real Property Disposal Pilot Program under which agencies will recommend and the Director will select real property that is not meeting federal government needs for expedited disposal.



Requires: (1) real property to
be sold under the firstprogram only for monetary proceeds of not less than fair market value; and (2) agencies to provide a detailed summaryreceive associated administrative expenses and 20% of the bill!)remainder of the proceeds, with the rest going the the Treasury.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
(Log inLatest Major Action: 6/20/2007: Referred to edit the wikiSenate committee. Status: Read twice and be the firstreferred to update the status of the bill!)Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)