What People Think
 |
 |
38% For, 62% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
  |
For |
  |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
  |
Comment on this Bill |
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
S. 155, The Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act of 2007
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
No revisions found.
Learn More
Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_SN_155.html
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
aries333
This bill needs to pass... it's a matter of national security.
Suidae
A necessary evil, we will need coal-to-liquid production capacity.
As long as we understand that it is necessary to develop sustainable energy solutions to replace fossil energy.
djiivu
An unnecessary evil. We could much more effectively reduce our dependence on energy imports by investing in and encouraging energy efficiency. A necessary increase in average fuel efficiency could decrease demand enough to make an increase in supply unnecessary.
Chris
An aweful idea that would only serve to increase our CO2 emissions. There are numerous ways to decrease our oil imports and not sacrafice our future climate.
justin
If this bill is passed, it should require manditory carbon sequestration as well as mixing biomass with th coal
A Nona
Coal-to-liquids technology returns almost double greenhouse-gas emissions. This bill will speed up global warming.
Vote No on this for a better environment.