Home

Blog

Subjects

Recent Blog Posts

How People Voted

38% For, 62% Against

(put this on your site)

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

S. 155, The Coal-to-Liquid Fuel Promotion Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Revision History Revisions Feed for This Bill

Below is the revision history of this article.

(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)

No revisions found.


Learn More

See Related Bills:

See Bills on the Same Subject:
Administrative procedure, Air pollution, Alternative energy sources, Armed forces, Aviation fuels, Budgets, Building construction, Business, Carbon cycle, Carbon dioxide, Coal liquefaction, Congress, Congressional reporting requirements, Construction costs, Cooperative societies, Defense contracts, Defense economics, Defense policy, Department of Energy, Depreciation and amortization, Diesel motor, Energy, Energy facilities, Energy research, Energy storage, Environmental health, Environmental protection, Environmental research, Executive departments, Federally-guaranteed loans, Finance, Gas industry, Government lending, Governmental investigations, Health policy, Income tax, Investment tax credit, Laboratories, Law, Licenses, Medical care, Methane, Military bases, Minimum tax, Motor vehicle pollution control, Natural resources, Petroleum, Petroleum industry, Petroleum reserves, Petroleum storage, Public contracts, Public health, Public lands, Research and development, Research and development facilities, Research centers, Science policy, Secondary recovery of gas, Secondary recovery of oil, Strategic materials, Synthetic fuel, Tax credits, Tax deductions, Tax returns, Taxation, Transportation ()

See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
N/A

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

aries333

February 13, 2007, 9:09pm (report abuse)

This bill needs to pass... it's a matter of national security.

Suidae

February 14, 2007, 10:02am (report abuse)

A necessary evil, we will need coal-to-liquid production capacity.

As long as we understand that it is necessary to develop sustainable energy solutions to replace fossil energy.

djiivu

March 23, 2007, 3:04pm (report abuse)

An unnecessary evil. We could much more effectively reduce our dependence on energy imports by investing in and encouraging energy efficiency. A necessary increase in average fuel efficiency could decrease demand enough to make an increase in supply unnecessary.

Chris

May 29, 2007, 2:44pm (report abuse)

An aweful idea that would only serve to increase our CO2 emissions. There are numerous ways to decrease our oil imports and not sacrafice our future climate.

justin

July 5, 2007, 9:18am (report abuse)

If this bill is passed, it should require manditory carbon sequestration as well as mixing biomass with th coal

A Nona

January 13, 2008, 11:50pm (report abuse)

Coal-to-liquids technology returns almost double greenhouse-gas emissions. This bill will speed up global warming.

Vote No on this for a better environment.

paul

November 17, 2008, 2:29pm (report abuse)

pass it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!

PAULY

November 17, 2008, 2:30pm (report abuse)

PASS IT !!!!!!!!!

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)