What People Think
 |
 |
17% For, 83% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
  |
For |
  |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
  |
Comment on this Bill |
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
P.L. 110-86, To provide authority to the Peace Corps to provide separation pay for host country resident personal services contractors of the Peace Corps
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the House.
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_PL_110-86.html
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Dece
This bill became a law with a unanimous voice vote . What is there unique to how this bill became law? Why was it voted and codified this way? Host country resident personal service contractors can mean Peace Corps Volunteers. It can also mean retirement of a contractor. The contractor agreement has no retirement pension in the contract because the contract or contractors are subject to the five year opportunity law for employees and contracts. The employees and contractors outside of the US are being allowed pensions, while the employees and contractors in the US are not; based on the Director deciding if they have the five year employment opportunity law waived and benefits for retirement benefits and pensions. The Director also controls the department pensions at Treasury.
This bill was forced, but why? Do these pensions already exist and was it legal for them to be created?