Home

Blog

How People Voted

29% For, 71% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-356, The Federal Protective Service Guard Contracting Reform Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on September 12, 2008, 10:06:53 (webmaster), with revision saved on December 16, 2008, 19:53:49 (webmaster):

H.R. 3068 would prohibit the award of contracts to provide guard services under the contract security guard program of the Federal Protective Service to a business concern that is owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was reportedFederal Protective Service Guard Contracting Reform Act of 2008 - Requires the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting through the Assistant Secretary of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to promulgate regulations establishing guidelines for the House on September 14, 2007. The summaryprohibition of contract awards for the provision of guard services under the contract security guard program of the Federal Protective Service to any business concern that version is repeated here.)</b>owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony. Authorizes the Secretary to consider permanent or interim prohibitions when promulgating the regulations.

Federal Protective Service Guard Contracting Reform Act of 2007 - ProhibitsRequires such regulations to: (1) identify which serious felonies may prohibit a contractor from being awarded a contract; (2) require contractors to provide information regarding any relevant felony convictions when submitting bids or proposals; (3) provide guidelines for the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting throughcontracting officer to assess present responsibility, mitigating factors, and the Assistant Secretary of U.S. Immigrationrisk associated with the previous conviction and Customs Enforcement, from awardingto award a contract for the provision of guard services under certain circumstances.

Requires
the contract security guard program of theAdministrator for Federal Protective ServiceProcurement Policy to any business concern that is owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony.report on establishing similar guidelines government-wide to the House Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 9/11/2008: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 953.9/30/2008: Presented to President.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the House.

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.

From the Blog

A Swarm of New Laws

Our “Silly Season” series of posts featured the laws racing across the House floor in the waning days of Congress’ regular session. Now it’s time to see what bills were passed into law. Mind you, not all of them are silly. B...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)