Home

Blog

How People Voted

29% For, 71% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-356, The Federal Protective Service Guard Contracting Reform Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on October 10, 2007, 14:51:19 (webmaster), with revision saved on October 10, 2007, 14:51:19 (webmaster):

H.R. 3068 would prohibit the award of contracts to provide guard services under the contract security guard program of the Federal Protective Service to a business concern that is owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to editFederal Protective Service Guard Contracting Reform Act of 2007 - Prohibits the wiki and beSecretary of Homeland Security from awarding a contract for the firstprovision of guard services under the contract security guard program of the Federal Protective Service to provide a detailed summaryany business concern that is owned, controlled, or operated by an individual who has been convicted of a felony. Requires the bill!)Secretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, to review existing contracts, terminate any contract to that does not comply with such requirements, and award a new contract that complies.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 10/3/2007: Referred to Senate committee. Status: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the House.

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.

From the Blog

A Swarm of New Laws

Our “Silly Season” series of posts featured the laws racing across the House floor in the waning days of Congress’ regular session. Now it’s time to see what bills were passed into law. Mind you, not all of them are silly. B...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)