Home

Blog

How People Voted

15% For, 85% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-338, The John F. Kennedy Center Reauthorization Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on June 27, 2008, 19:49:40 (webmaster), with revision saved on September 18, 2008, 19:48:43 (webmaster):

H.R. 3986 would amend the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize appropriations for the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was reported to the House on December 10, 2007. The summary of that version is repeated here.)</b>

John. F. Kennedy Center Reauthorization Act of 2007 - Amends the John F. Kennedy Center Act to authorize the Board of Trustees of the John F. Kennedy for the Performing Arts to study, plan, design, engineer, and construct a photovoltaic system for the main roof of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Requires the Board, no later than 60 days before beginning construction of the system, to report on the feasibility and design of such project.

Authorizes appropriations for FY2008-FY2010 to the Board for: (1) maintenance, repair, and security; (2) capital projects; and (3) the photovoltaic system.

Prohibits anything in this Act from being construed to limit or affect the authority or responsibility of the National Capital Planning Commission nor the Commission of Fine Arts.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 6/26/2008: Passed/agreed to in Senate.9/17/2008: Resolving differences -- House actions. Status: Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent.At the conclusion of debate, the chair put the question on the motion to suspend the rules. Mr. Graves objected to the vote on the grounds that a quorum was not present. Further proceedings on the motion were postponed. The point of no quorum was withdrawn.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the House.

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)