How People Voted
43% For, 57% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
P.L. 110-317, The Hubbard Act
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Cost per :
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the House.
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)





Visitor Comments
Martin
July 31, 2008, 9:11pm (report abuse)Why do these "sole survivors" have to be discharged? Why can't they just get an instant transfer to the military installation of their choice? I do feel for the families that have lost all but one child to military service and the remaining child should be taken out of harms way. I don't think it is fair though, that these individuals would get the same benefits as those who stay to full term at their own peril.
Special treatment, no free pass.