Home

Blog

How People Voted

19% For, 81% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-313, A bill to amend title 35, United States Code, and the Trademark Act of 1946 to provide that the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, shall appoint administrative patent judges and administrative trademark judges, and for other purposes

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on October 23, 2008, 19:59:48 (webmaster):

S. 3295 would amend title 35, United States Code, and the Trademark Act of 1946 to provide that the Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, shall appoint administrative patent judges and administrative trademark judges.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on July 22, 2008. The summary of that version is repeated here.)</b>

Transfers from the director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)
to edit the wikiSecretary of Commerce the authority to appoint administrative patent judges and beadministrative trademark judges. Requires the firstSecretary to provideconsult with the director on such appointments. Names the PTO's deputy director as an additional member of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

Authorizes the Secretary, in his or her discretion, to deem the appointment of an administrative patent judge or an administrative trademark judge who, before enactment, held office pursuant to an appointment by the director to take effect on the date on which the director initially appointed the administrative patent judge.

Makes it
a detailed summarydefense to a challenge to the appointment of an administrative patent judge or an administrative trademark judge on the bill!)basis of the judge's having been originally appointed by the director that the administrative patent judge so appointed was acting as a de facto officer.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to update the status of the bill!)Latest Major Action: 8/31/2008: Cleared for White House.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)