How People Voted
 |
 |
22% For, 78% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
P.L. 110-180, The NICS Improvement Amendments Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
There was no up-or-down vote in the House.
There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
HBB
June 20, 2007, 3:48am (report abuse)It's unfortunate and unwise that the National Rifle Association and the National Shooting Sports Foundation both back this bill, which will do nothing but further convolute the National Instant Check System -- an abortion in itself.
The Brady Bill is nothing more than feel-good nonsense and is arguably unconstitutional. It should never have been passed.
Criminals don't buy guns legally -- they steal them or get them through the black market.
Saint Jimi
June 22, 2007, 4:28am (report abuse)An armed society never takes this sort of thing laying down. And no government ever lasted by disarming its people. Ours is well on its way (in a hurry) to being replaced wholesale.
Brian
August 7, 2007, 5:57pm (report abuse)I too find it disturbing that the NRA so vehemently supports this bill, especially since I am a member. I don't understand what was wrong with the NICS in the first place, other than the fact that it is (though some would argue this point with me) a form of gun control. Any kind of regulation on firearms is a step towards an eventual ban. After all Janet Reno once said: "Waiting periods are a step, registration is a step, the prohibition of privately owned firearms is the goal."
Veteran
October 1, 2007, 12:44pm (report abuse)Look closely Amairka; The real purpose of this bill is to provide the Fourth Reich the ability to rubber-stamp the disarmament of combat Veterans, who by the way have no history of gun abuse any greater than the normal cross-section of our society. Go research what purpose the Stryker vehicles and the Boeing 747 aerial sprayer are specifically designed for; That should wake the public up to what's going on with the Fourth Reich shoring up for Patriot reaction to their evermore increasing fascist agenda. It should wake the public up but won't because the vast majority have been dumbed down to the point of not caring. Who's gonna defend the public from the Fourth Reich if it isn't our combat Veterans?
John Roane
January 14, 2008, 10:01am (report abuse)Dear Americans:
This bill takes away several of American Veteran’s US Constitutional Rights. If the rights of American Veterans, who fought, bleed, and died for The US Constitution can be taken your rights are next.
RecordOnlineGuide
December 23, 2008, 1:51pm (report abuse)Try these sites if you want to waste some more time and money
http://RecordOnlineGuide.blogspot.com