Home

Blog

How People Voted

50% For, 50% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 6820, The Water Assessment and Treatment Evaluation Research Study Act of 2008

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on August 2, 2008, 19:30:22 (webmaster), with revision saved on November 5, 2008, 19:31:41 (webmaster):

H.R. 6820 would direct the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency to conduct a study of the presence of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in drinking water supplies in the United States.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to editWater Assessment and Treatment Evaluation Research Study Act of 2008 or the wikiWATER Study Act of 2008 - Requires the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to study and bereport to Congress on the firstpresence, sources, and effects of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in U.S. drinking water supplies and on ways to provide a detailed summaryproperly dispose of such products and improve water treatment. Directs the bill!)Administrator to examine wastewater effluent and run-off from agricultural operations in identifying such sources.


</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 8/1/2008: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)