Home

Blog

How People Voted

38% For, 62% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-427, To authorize the Administrator of General Services to take certain actions with respect to parcels of real property located in Eastlake, Ohio, and Koochiching County, Minnesota, and for other purposes

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on August 1, 2008, 19:31:27 (webmaster), with revision saved on October 6, 2008, 19:41:05 (webmaster):

H.R. 6524 would authorize the Administrator of General Services to take certain actions with respect to parcels of real property located in Eastlake, Ohio, and Koochiching County, Minnesota.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(LogAuthorizes the Administrator of the General Services Administration (GSA) to release certain restrictions in the deed for a parcel of land conveyed to edit the wiki and becity of Eastlake, Ohio, (i.e., use of land only for recreational purposes) in exchange for $30,000.

Directs
the firstAdministrator to provide a detailed summaryconvey to Koochiching County, Minnesota, certain land located in International Falls, Minnesota, (formerly the site of the bill!)Koochiching Army Reserve Training Center) in exchange for $30,000.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 7/31/2008: House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Ordered10/6/2008: Presented to be Reported by Voice Vote.President.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the House.

  • There was no up-or-down vote in the Senate.

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)