Home

Blog

How People Voted

64% For, 36% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-275, The Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on June 25, 2008, 19:30:29 (webmaster), with revision saved on July 29, 2008, 19:31:39 (webmaster):

H.R. 6331 would amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to extend expiring provisions under the Medicare Program, to improve beneficiary access to preventive and mental health services, to enhance low-income benefit programs, and to maintain access to care in rural areas, including pharmacy access.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 - Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Social Security Act (SSA) to provide for coverageHouse on June 24, 2008. The summary of additional preventive services.that version is repeated here.) </b>

Provides Medicare Improvements for gradual eliminationPatients and Providers Act of copayment rates for2008 - <b>Title I: Medicare psychiatric- Subtitle A: Beneficiary Improvements - Part 1: Prevention, Mental Health, and Marketing</b> - (Sec. 101) Amends title XVIII (Medicare) of the Social Security Act (SSA), as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to cover additional preventive services.

Places prohibitionsIncludes body mass index and limitations on certain sales and marketing activities under Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and prescription drug plans.end-of-life planning among initial preventive physical examinations.

Requires offering of a range(Sec. 102) Specifies stages for gradual elimination by 2014 of copayment rates for Medicare supplemental policies.psychiatric services.

Extends(Sec. 103) Prescribes prohibitions on certain sales and marketing activities under Medicare Advantage (MA) plans and prescription drug plans, including: (1) the qualifying individual program.provision of gifts or prizes as enrollment inducements; (2) unsolicited means of direct contact; (3) cross-selling (the sale of other non-health related products, such as annuities and life insurance, during any sales or marketing activity or presentation conducted with respect to an MA plan); or (4) the provision of meals to prospective plan enrollees.

Provides for applicationRequires the Secretary of a full low-income subsidy assets testHealth and Human Services to establish limitations under the Medicare Savings Program.MA plans of certain other marketing activities, including co-branding.

Eliminates Medicare part D (Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program) late enrollment penalties paid by subsidy-eligible individuals.Requires the inclusion of the plan type in the plan name.

DirectsImposes requirements on MA organizations relating to the Secretaryexclusive use of Healthlicensed agents and Human Services to make grantsbrokers and compliance with state information requests in order to enable states for state health insurance assistance programs, area agencies on aging, and aging and disability resource centers. to collaborate with the Secretary to address fraudulent or inappropriate marketing practices.

Authorizes(Sec. 104) Directs the Secretary to award grants to statesprovide for increasing the deliveryimplementation of mental health services or other health care services to meet the needschanges in the National Association of veterans of Operation Iraqi FreedomInsurance Commissioners (NAIC) model law and Operation Enduring Freedom livingregulations approved by NAIC in rural areas.its Model #651 on March 11, 2007, as modified to reflect the changes made under this Act and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008.

Permits rebasing for sole community hospitals.Requires a Medigap policy issuer to make available to an eligible individual at least Medicare supplemental policies classified as &quot;C&quot; or &quot;F.&quot;

Directs<b>Part II: Low-Income Programs</b> - (Sec. 111) Extends the Secretary to establish a demonstration project for development and testing of new community health integration models in certain rural counties.qualifying individual (QI) program through December 2009.

AmendsExtends the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007,total amount available for allocation with respect to extend through FY2009 the reclassificationstate coverage of certain hospitals.Medicare cost-sharing for additional low-income Medicare beneficiaries.

Increases physicians' payments. Revises requirements(Sec. 112) Provides for and extendsapplication of a full low-income subsidy (LIS) assets test under the quality reporting system, including incentive payments.Medicare Savings Program.

Directs the Secretary(Sec. 113) Requires Social Security Administration assistance with Medicare Savings Program and LIS program applications. Makes appropriations for Administration costs related to establish a Physician Feedback Program.such assistance.

Provides for: (1) incentives for electronic prescribing of medicine; (2) expanded access to primary care services; (3) extension of the floor on(Sec. 114) Eliminates Medicare work geographic adjustment under the Medicare physician fee schedule; and (4) an accreditation requirement for advanced diagnostic imaging services.part D (Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program) late enrollment penalties payable by subsidy-eligible individuals.

Revises requirements(Sec. 115) Eliminates estate recovery under Medicaid of state-paid medical assistance for Medicare anesthesia teaching programs. cost-sharing.

Makes permanent the exception(Sec. 116) Prohibits support and maintenance furnished in kind from being counted as income with respect to the 60-day limit oneligibility for low-income subsidies under Medicare reciprocal billing arrangements between two physicians over a longer continuous period during all of which one of them is ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of the armed forces.part D (Voluntary Prescription Drug Benefit Program).

Provides for coverage of pulmonary and cardiac rehabilitation.Excludes life insurance policies from being counted as a resource under the Supplemental Security Income program (thus precluding their use in determining resources under the Medicare part D program).

Extends increased Medicare payments(Sec. 117) Provides for ground ambulance services.judicial review of decisions of the Commissioner of Social Security under the Medicare part D program.

Amends(Sec. 118) Requires translation into 10 languages (other than English) of the Public Health Services Act to direct the Secretary to establish pilot projects with respect to chronic kidney disease.model application form for medical assistance for Medicare cost-sharing.

Revises requirements(Sec. 119) Directs the Secretary to make grants to states for renal dialysis.state health insurance assistance programs, area agencies on aging, and aging and disability resource centers.

Amends title XVIII (Medicare) ofRequires the Social Security ActSecretary, acting through the Assistant Secretary for Aging, to delay generally until after 2011make a grant to, or contract with, a qualified, experienced entity to: (1) maintain and update web-based decision support tools, and integrated, person-centered systems, designed to inform older individuals about the full implementationrange of the Medicare competitive acquisition programbenefits for which they may be eligible under federal and state programs; and (2) develop an information clearinghouse on best practices and the purchase of durable medical equipment (DME), prosthetics, orthotics,most cost-effective methods for finding and supplies (DMEPOS).informing older individuals with greatest economic need about such programs.

Revises<b>Subtitle B: Provisions Relating to Part A</b> - (Sec. 121) Authorizes the Secretary to award grants to states for increasing the delivery of mental health services or other health care services to meet the needs of veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom living in rural areas.

Extends the authorization for FLEX (Medicare rural hospital flexibility program) grants through FY2010.

Includes among FLEX grant purposes providing support for critical access hospitals for quality improvement, quality reporting, performance improvements, and benchmarking.

Authorizes the Secretary to award grants to eligible critical access hospitals to assist them to transition to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) and assisted living facilities.

(Sec. 122) Permits substitution of a specified rebased target amount for the amount ordinarily calculated in Medicare payments to sole community hospitals for inpatient hospital services.

(Sec. 123) Directs the Secretary to establish a demonstration project for development and testing of new community health integration models in certain rural counties for the delivery of acute care, extended care, and other essential health services to Medicare beneficiaries. Authorizes appropriations for FY2010-FY2012.

(Sec. 124) Amends the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend through FY2009 the reclassification of certain hospitals.

(Sec. 125) Amends SSA title XVIII to repeal the unique deeming authority under which an insitution accredited as a hospital by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals shall be deemed to be a hospital eligible for Medicare payments.

<b>Subtitle C: Provisions Relating to Part B - Part 1: Physicians' Services</b> - (Sec. 131) Increases the update for physicians' payments for the second half of 2008 and for 2009.

Modifies the Physician Assistance and Quality Initiative Fund to eliminate funding for FY2013 and, if a specified contingency occurs, FY2014.

Revises requirements for and extends the quality reporting system for 2010 and subsequent years, including increased incentive payments. Includes qualified audiologists as eligible professionals who must report data of quality measures.

Directs the Secretary to establish a Physician Feedback Program, under which the Secretary shall use claims data to make confidential reports to physicians that measure the resources involved in furnishing care to individuals.

Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the Physician Feedback Program.

(Sec. 132) Provides for incentive payments for electronic prescribing of medicine.

(Sec. 133) Amends the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 to authorize the Secretary to expand the duration and the scope of the Medicare Medical Home Demonstration Project if such expansion is expected to: (1) improve the quality of patient care without increasing spending under the Medicare program; and (2) reduce spending under the Medicare program without reducing the quality of patient care. Provides funding.

(Sec. 134) Amends SSA title XVIII, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend through calendar 2009 the 1.0 floor on the Medicare work geographic adjustment under the Medicare physician fee schedule.

(Sec. 135) Establishes an accreditation requirement for advanced diagnostic imaging services.

Directs the Secretary to conduct a demonstration project to assess the appropriate use of imaging services.

(Sec. 136) Amends the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Benefits Improvement and Protection Act of 2000, as amended by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, and the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend through 2009 specified treatment of certain physician pathology services under Medicare.

(Sec. 137) Makes permanent the exception to the 60-day limit on Medicare reciprocal billing arrangements between two physicians over a longer continuous period during all of which one of them is ordered to active duty as a member of a reserve component of the armed forces.

(Sec. 138) Directs the Secretary to increase by 5% the fee schedule otherwise applicable for specified psychotherapy services during the period from July 1, 2008, through December 31, 2009.

(Sec. 139) Sets forth a special 100% fee schedule payment rule for teaching anesthesiologists. Directs the Secretary to make specified adjustments to payments to teaching certified registered nurse anesthetists.

<b>Part II: Other Payment and Coverage Improvements</b> - (Sec. 141) Amends SSA title XVIII, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to extend the exceptions process for Medicare physical therapy caps through December 31, 2009.

(Sec. 142) Extends the payment rule for brachytherapy and therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals through December 31, 2009.

(Sec. 143) Defines covered outpatient speech-language pathology services.

(Sec. 144) Provides for coverage of pulmonary and cardiac rehabilitation items and services, including an intensive cardiac rehabilitation program.

Repeals the requirement that ownership of oxygen equipment be transferred from the supplier to the individual user after the 36th continuous month of its use. Requires continuous: (1) furnishing of such equipment by the supplier after the 36th month for the remainder of the equipment's useful lifetime; and (2) Medicare payment for the rental of the equipment.

(Sec. 145) Repeals the Medicare competitive bidding demonstration project for clinical laboratory services.

Specifies a reduction in the clinical laboratory test fee schedule update adjustment for 2009 through 2013.

(Sec. 146) Extends increased Medicare payments for ground ambulance services. Sets forth a special payment rule for air ambulance services under the ambulance fee schedule.

(Sec. 147) Extends and expands the Medicare hold harmless provision under the prospective payment system for hospital outpatient department (HOPD) services for certain hospitals.

(Sec. 148) Provides that clinical diagnostic laboratory services furnished by a critical access hospital shall be treated as being furnished as part of outpatient critical access services without regard to whether the outpatient is physically present in the critical access hospital, or in a skilled nursing facility (SNF) or a clinic (including a rural health clinic) operated by such a hospital, at the time the specimen is collected.

(Sec. 149) Adds a hospital-based or critical access hospital-based renal dialysis center, a SNF, and a community mental health center as originating sites for purposes of payment for telehealth services.

(Sec. 150) Directs the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MEDPAC) to study and report to Congress on the feasibility and advisability of establishing a Medicare Chronic Care Practice Research Network that would serve as a standing network of providers testing new models of care coordination and other care approaches for chronically ill beneficiaries.

(Sec. 151) Directs the Secretary, in the case of services furnished by federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), to establish payment limits with respect to services furnished: (1) in 2010 at the limits otherwise established for such year increased by $5; and (2) in a subsequent year at the limits established for the previous year increased by the percentage increase in the Medicare Economic Index (MEI).

Requires the Comptroller General to study and report to the Congress on the effects and adequacy of the Medicare FQHC payment structure.

(Sec. 152) Amends the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary to establish pilot projects to increase public and medical community awareness of and screening for chronic kidney disease, as well as enhance surveillance systems to better assess its prevalence and incidence. Authorizes appropriations.

Extends Medicare coverage to kidney disease patient education services.

(Sec. 153) Revises requirements for payments for renal dialysis services. Reduces the composite rate factor in the updates for renal dialysis services furnished during calendar 2009, and those furnished on or after January 1, 2010.

Directs the Secretary, for dialysis services furnished on or after January 1, 2011, to implement a (bundled) payment system under which a single payment is made to a service provider or a renal dialysis facility for renal dialysis services in lieu of any other payment.

Institutes a system of quality incentives for service providers and renal dialysis facilities in the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) program.

Directs the Comptroller General to report to Congress on implementation fo the ESRD bundling payment system and quality initiative.

(Sec. 154) Delays generally until after 2011 full implementation of the Medicare competitive acquisition program for the purchase of durable medical equipment (DME), prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS).

Revises requirements for
such program, dividing its implementation into two rounds, and specifying covered item updates for 2009-2014.

Prescribes requirements for application of accreditation in implementing quality standards.

Requires suppliers to disclose subcontractors.


Directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to provide for a competitive acquisition ombudsman within the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services to respond to complaints and inquiries by suppliers and individuals.

ProvidesSpecifies topics for the Comptroller General's required study and report to Congress on the impact of competitive acquisition of DME on suppliers, manufacturers, and patients.

Sets forth a special rule for the competitive acquisition program for diabetic testing strips.

<b>Subtitle D: Provisions Relating to Part C</b> - (Sec. 161) Provides
for phase-out of indirect costs of medical education (IME) from capitation rates.

(Sec. 162) Revises requirements for certain non-employer Medicare Advantage (MA) private fee-for-service plans, as well as MA plans for special needs individuals, including, respectively, among other changes, requirements to assure access to network coverage and care management requirements for all special needs plans.

(Sec. 163) Requires MA private fee-for-service and Medicare Savings Account (MSA) plans to have a quality improvement program

(Sec. 165) Places a limitation on out-of-pocket costs (cost-sharing) for dual eligibles and qualified Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in a specialized MA plan for special needs individuals.

(Sec. 166) Amends SSA title XVIII, as amended by the Medicare, Medicaid, and SCHIP Extension Act of 2007, to decrease the amount of funding available to the Medicare Advantage Regional Plan Stabilization Fund during 2014.

(Sec. 167) Extends through January 1, 2010, reasonable cost reimbursement contracts the Secretary may enter with organizations whose capacity to bear the risk of potential losses under a risk-sharing contract is in doubt.

Modifies the requirement that at least two MA regional plans be offered in the service area for the prohibition against the extension or renewal of a reasonable cost contract on or after January 1, 2010, to apply. Requires that such plans not be offered by the same MA organization.

Changes the minimum enrollment requirements applicable to such a plan.

Directs the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the reasons, if any, why reasonable cost reimbursement contracts are unable to become MA plans under Medicare part C.

(Sec. 168) Requires MEDPAC to study and report to Congress on how comparable measures of performance and patient experience (quality measures) can be collected and reported by 2011 for the MA program and the original Medicare fee-for-service program.

(Sec. 169) Directs MEDPAC to study and report to Congress on the correlation between: (1) the costs that Medicare Advantage organizations incur in providing Medicare Advantage plan coverage for items and services covered under the original Medicare fee-for-service program, as reflected in plan bids; and (2) county-level spending under such original Medicare fee-for-service program on a per capita basis. Requires study of: (1) alternate approaches to payment with respect to a Medicare beneficiary enrolled in an MA plan other than through county-level payment area equivalents; (2) the accuracy and completeness of county-level estimates of per capita spending under the original Medicare fee-for-service program; and (3) ways to improve the accuracy and completeness of such county-level estimates.

<b>Subtitle E: Provisions Relating to Part D - Part I: Improving Pharmacy Access</b> - (Sec. 171) Requires prompt payment of clean claims by prescription drug plans (PDPs) and MA-Prescription Drug plans under Medicare part D. Requires interest payments on late claims.

(Sec. 172) Requires each PDP contract with a PDP sponsor to provide that the pharmacy located in, or having a contract with, a long-term care facility shall have between 30 and 90 days to submit claims to the sponsor for reimbursement.

(Sec. 173) Requires each contract with a PDP sponsor using a pharmacy reimbursement prescription drug pricing standard to require a weekly update of the standard to reflect accurately the market price of acquiring the drug.

<b>Part II: Other Provisions</b> - (Sec. 175) Includes barbiturates and benzodiazepines as covered part D drugs.

(Sec. 176) Directs the Secretary to identify categories and classes of drugs for which: (1) restricted access would have major or life threatening clinical consequences for individuals who have a disease or disorder treated by them; and (2) there is significant clinical need for such individuals to have access to multiple drugs within a category or class because of unique chemical actions and pharmacological effects of such drugs, such as drugs used in the treatment of cancer.

Requires PDP sponsors to include all covered part D drugs in a formulary in categories and classes identified by the Secretary, unless the Secretary establishes exceptions according to a specified process.

<b>Subtitle F: Other Provisions</b> - (Sec. 181) Allows the use of information provided to the Secretary under contracts with PDP sponsors for the general purposes of Medicare part D, improving public health through research. Requires such information to be made available to congressional support agencies for congressional oversight of the part D program.

(Sec. 182) Revises the definition of &quot;medically accepted indication for drugs.&quot;

(Sec. 183) Directs the Secretary to: (1) contract with a consensus-based entity (e.g., the National Quality Forum) for certain activities relating to health care performance measurement; and (2) evaluate and report to Congress on approaches for the collection of data regarding health care disparities. Provides funding.

Requires the Comptroller General to study and report to Congress on the performance and costs of such entity.

(Sec. 184) Authorizes the Secretary to develop alternative methods of payment for items and services provided under clinical trials and comparative effectiveness studies sponsored or supported by an agency supported by an agency of the Department of Health and Human Services to the extent such alternative methods are necessary to preserve the scientific validity of such trials or studies, such as in the case where masking the identity of interventions from patients and investigators is necessary to comply with the particular trial or study design.

(Sec. 185) Directs the Secretary to: (1) evaluate approaches for the collection of data that allow for the ongoing, accurate, and timely collection and evaluation of data on disparities in health care services and performance on the basis of race, ethnicity, and gender; and (2) implement the most effective ones.

(Sec. 186) Directs the Secretary to establish a demonstration project to determine the greatest needs and most effective methods of outreach to Medicare beneficiaries who were previously uninsured.

(Sec. 187) Directs the Inspector General to prepare and publish a report on: (1) the extent to which Medicare providers and plans are complying with the Office for Civil Rights' Guidance to Federal Financial Assistance Recipients Regarding Prohibition Against National Origin Discrimination Affecting Limited English Proficient Persons and the Office of Minority Health's Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services (CLAS) Standards in health care; and (2) a description of the costs associated with or savings related to the provision of language services.

(Sec. 188) Creates the Medicare Improvement Fund. Provides funding.

(Sec. 189) Directs the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services to participate in the Federal Payment Levy Program and ensure that all Medicare provider and supplier payments are processed through it, in specified graduated percentages, by the end of FY2011.

Requires any disbursing official of the Department of Health and Human Services to apply administrative offsets with respect to Medicare provider or supplier payments.

<b>Title II: Medicaid</b> - (Sec. 201) Amends the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006 to extend through June 30, 2009, the transitional medical assistance (TMA), and the abstinence education program under SSA title XIX (Medicaid).

(Sec. 202) Amends SSA title XVIII to extend the Medicaid disproportionate share hospital (DSH) allotment for Tennessee and Hawaii.


Revises requirements(Sec. 203) Delays until October 1, 2009, the application of the new payment limit for MA private fee-for-service plans as well as MA plans for special needs individuals.multiple source drugs under Medicaid.

Modifies requirements for quality improvement programs.(Sec. 204) Amends SSA title XI to entitle states to receive reconsideration of a claim disallowance.

Requires prompt payment(Sec. 205) Amends the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of clean claims1985 to exempt Medicaid health insuring organizations operated by prescription drug planspublic entities in Ventura and MA-Prescription Drug plans under Medicare part D.Merced Counties, California, from the requirement that they be Medicaid managed care organizations meeting certain criteria.

RevisesDeclares that such exemption shall not apply with respect to any period for which the definitionnumber of medically accepted indication for drugs.Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled with such health insuring organizations exceeds 16% (currently 14%) of the number of such beneficiaries in California.

Directs<b>Title III: Miscellaneous</b> - (Sec. 301) Amends the Secretary to: (1) contract with a consensus-based entity for certain activities relatingDeficit Reduction Act of 2005 to health care performance measurement; and (2) evaluate and report to Congress on approachesextend through FY2009 supplemental grants under SSA title IV part D (Temporary Assistance for the collection of data regarding health care disparities.Needy Families) (TANF).

Creates(Sec. 302) Amends SSA title IV part E (Federal Payments for Foster Care and Adoption Assistance) to set at 70% the Medicare Improvement Fund.federal matching rate for foster care and adoption assistance for the District of Columbia.

Extends(Sec. 303) Amends the transitional medical assistance (TMA), the abstinence education program,Public Health Service Act to extend through FY2011 special diabetes grant programs for Type I diabetes and allotments for disproportionate share hospitals (DSHs) under SSA title XIX (Medicaid). Indians.

Amends(Sec. 304) Directs the Deficit Reduction ActSecretary to contract with the Institute of 2005Medicine (IOM) of the National Academies to extend supplemental grants under SSA title IV part D (Temporary Assistanceidentify, and report to the Secretary and Congress on, the methodological standards for Needy Families) (TANF).conducting systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness research on health and health care in order to ensure that reviewing organizations have objective, scientifically valid, and consistent information on methods.

AmendsRequires the Public Health Service ActSecretary to extend special diabetes grant programs.contract with the IOM, also, to study and report to the Secretary and the appropriate congressional committees on the best methods used in developing clinical practice guidelines in order to ensure that organizations developing such guidelines have objective, scientifically valid, and consistent information on approaches.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 6/24/2008: Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.7/15/2008: Vetoed by President.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

From the Blog

Interested in SNM? Got Radiopharmaceuticals?

[There were two candidates for the title of this post. I gave you both. Let me know which one you like better.] This week, Congress overrode the President’s veto of H.R. 6331, the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act of 2008, ma...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Mel Lair

June 24, 2008, 6:32pm (report abuse)

I am afraid if this bill is not passed there will be doctors leaving practice - the baby boomers will be seriously affected in the near future. I am a baby boomer, I believe this bill is necessary to protect our access with Medicare doctors.

jb

June 24, 2008, 9:30pm (report abuse)

This bill is piggbacking with HR6252. Which is delaying the competitve biddding implementation for July 1st. Pray to God The Senate approves it like the House did. yay 355 nay 59. If not you will not recognize the healthcare system in the United Stats.

Ron Melton

June 25, 2008, 7:08pm (report abuse)

I understand that if this plan passes that it will end Private Fee for Service Medicare Advantage Plans.(Part C of Medicare)
These plans save seniors on average $800 per year in health care cost per Congress' own numbers. Seniors in poor health will save thousands.
Fee for service plans allow low income and seniors with special needs to see any doctors that agrees to bill the plan. They are not limited to HMO or PPO networks. They are best suited to people in rural areas and for those who cannot afford to pay $160-$200 month for Medigap plans.
If you want to help the health care system, keep the insurance companies from telling the doctors how to do their job. We're not talking about Direct repair shop here for autos. We talking about people's lives. Place a cap on prescription drugs since they are being handed out like candy, and address the cost regarding malpractice insurance. You can't fix America's health care crisis by moving benefits around.

MT/WY/SD

June 25, 2008, 10:22pm (report abuse)

Medicare Part C isn't even an option in rural america. Sure, Medicare recipients can enroll in a Medicare Part C plan, but finding a doctor or a specialist that accepts the Medicare Advantage Plan is the problem, that is what this plan is doing-fixing the limited access problem. The other issue is too many seniors today are being balanced billed by doctors, even after the doctor or facility stated they accepted the plans limitations, and currently they have that right. It is time to change the plans, so they are all PPO's if at all.

Bob

June 25, 2008, 10:24pm (report abuse)

Private-fee-for-service plans have cost members I know personally hundreds of thousands of do$$ars. An example, recently an 88 year old man living in Montana went to have the batteries changed in his pacemaker-the cost was $35,000.oo, his Humana Gold paid $9,000.oo. He thought he would only have to pay $3,000 maximum toward medical expenses per calendar year. He did, but was balance billed for the difference of $23,000.oo. Total he paid for one simple procedure in rural america: $26,000.oo/Humana $9,000.oo.
The system is flaud while these plans are sold fraudulantly, never telling the senior that they are buying garbage.

id

June 25, 2008, 10:26pm (report abuse)

It's not even insurance. Not only can doctors balance bill, and do, according to all of the Private-fee-for-service plans summary of benefits, they also can limit benefits for a member, not having to meet the same requirements and DRG's as Original Medicare. Most of the Medicare Advantage Plans started in November 2005, as did the Medicare Part D plans, now over 1/3 of them are valued at over a Billion dollars in net worth, according to an issue of Inc. Magazines Top 100 companies growth performance. Wellcare started with less than $1 million dollars and in 2 years time was valued over $3 Billion just in Medicare Part D. The system does need fixed. I am in full support of HR 6331 and S 3101, and you should be too, otherwise your abusing the elderly. The real matter is that they should eliminate Medicare Advantage.

8662206598

June 25, 2008, 10:29pm (report abuse)

You are all right, except for Ron Melton. Medicare Supplements with a number of carriers that I work with are $80/month for a Standard Plan F for someone age 65, and $125/month for someone age 80. The insurance companies offering higher premium costs for a Medicare Supplement are doing the same thing as the Medicare Advantage Plans, milking the consumer for every dollar and then raising their cost until they can't pay. The solution is simple, get on the internet and type in www.insureme.com and you'll get flooded with rates, not people at your door, but instant quotes for insurance. This is valuable for those needing better costs or a better plan for their healthcare. So stand up and support the HR 6331. It's the right thing to do, and its time to stop the soap selling Medicare Advantage companies and agents.

John Dvorak

June 25, 2008, 10:31pm (report abuse)

Support the bill, its time to fix Medicare for our childrens sake. Next they need to fix Social Security or come up with another plan like it.

judith

June 25, 2008, 10:37pm (report abuse)

As a concerned constituent and Medicare beneficiary, I am writing to ask you to cosponsor The Medicare Access to Rehabilitation Services Act (S 450/HR 748). The bill would repeal financial limits, or 'therapy caps,' on my Medicare outpatient physical therapy, The therapy caps limit my outpatient rehabilitation coverage to $1,810 for combined physical therapy and speech-language pathology services in 2008.
Congress has recognized the potential harm in this policy and repeatedly has passed moratoriums on its enforcement. In 2007, Congress passed legislation providing exceptions for beneficiaries who need care above the financial limit — but only through June 30, 2008. Now is the time to provide a long-term solution to the flawed therapy cap policy. I urge you to take action to pass legislation to remove the therapy caps once and for all and prevent harm to Medicare beneficiaries who need rehabilitation services.
As you may know, there are inherent problems with the therapy cap

SP

June 26, 2008, 8:41am (report abuse)

I'm an agent and I don't like these plans. But I also know I have rural clients who can't pay even $80 for a medicare supplement. This is better than nothing. It is better than regular medicare alone.

Darren

June 26, 2008, 10:10am (report abuse)

The other reality is simple: Why should Doctors offices have to effectively further subsidize Medicare by having their rates cut?
In every industry, if one of your major clients comes along and says, "We have no increased volume for you at the moment, but we want a 10% price break," you can and should make reconsider if you then want to remain in business with that client. Especially when your costs have done *nothing* but gone up due to inflation.
Why should any Doctor then not reconsider their participation in Medicare, if the rate cut scheduled for July 1 (which this bill would postpone) goes through?

Norman

June 26, 2008, 10:12am (report abuse)

PFFS are a must if you can not afford a medicare supplement at 175.00 a month. Please keep them, it works great for everyone I know

Carol

June 26, 2008, 10:38am (report abuse)

Please pass this!! Many doctors will not be able to practice and will leave and then what! Let's not take the docs for granted as many seem to want!!

Gail

June 26, 2008, 3:03pm (report abuse)

The Medicare Advantage PFFS plans provider senior's with important coverage. On the average PFFS plan save senior $800.00 per year.

Alan

June 26, 2008, 10:30pm (report abuse)

Medicare Advantage plans are NOT Medicare Supplements. They are simply an alternative coverage to Original Medicare. You guys talk about balanced billing, that happens with Medicare as well.(15% Excess charge)
You need a Medigap plan for Medicare if you wish to have full coverage. Their are also Med Advantage plans with premiums that cover more.
Force the doctors to accept the plans IF they accept Original Medicare.
Encourage Advantage gap coverage for those who can afford it or want it.
But for those who cannot afford the high cost of supplemental, it is still better benefits that Medicare alone.
As response to "8662206598" I suppose that you would supply internet access to every senior living in a trailer with a pair of rabbit ears. Get real, Stiff penalties and jail time to agents going around screwing seniors and making a mockery of "helping people" will bend the corruption as well as leveling commissions will discourage "churning."

Allen

June 27, 2008, 7:48am (report abuse)

Medicare Advantage plans are good only for the agents and companies that sell this sorry excuse for health care. This stuff is not going to work. It cost the taxpayer way more than Original Medicare. If someone can not afford a medicare supplement I believe they are better off with The original medicare and no insurance rather than have to deal with the Medicare Advantage option.

Ron

June 27, 2008, 8:34am (report abuse)

From the Medicare.gov website, comparing health plans with a person in poor health in the Atlanta area:
Estimated Annual Cost:
Original Medicare- $8950 vs.
PFFS MA-PD - $6650
That's $2300 more a year that a senior on a fixed income would have to pay out with Original Medicare. Original Medicare doesn't even pay drugs, an add'l premium.
How can you say that Original Medicare alone is better?????
Granted MA plans are not perfect and they need some refining, but they are way better than Medicare alone.

Jacob

June 27, 2008, 10:04am (report abuse)

The bill did not pass the senate!
I am a cardiologist and this makes me quite upset. Currently doctors are the only people who HAVE to provide care for uninsured people in the ER for free. What other service in our country is FREE! Can you get a free hamburger from McDonalds? NO! BUT you can get a free heart cath.
Private insurance reimbursement will also drop due to this.
Soon there will be NO doctors caring for the elderly, but don't worry I am sure another bill will be passed MANDATING us to provide that swervice too.
What a joke, I am not proud to be an American today!

JC

June 27, 2008, 12:38pm (report abuse)

I agree with Jacob. I am a Home care provider and this bill was a necessity to pass. Unfortunately these Republican senators all care about the money in their pockets from these Insurance companies (aka humana, united, aetna) Let's get real here folks. Look at what these Medicare advantage plans are making on average $1000 per more each senior.) Put that into the pot with the trainwreck aka Part D donut hole program and this is one Cluster you know what of a healthcare system. It is amazing how a bipartisan bill passes the house with flying colors and these clows in the Senate have to vote with their wallet and not the heart of the elderly beneficiary who is being harmed.

Bill

June 27, 2008, 12:38pm (report abuse)

I dont knock all MA plans however, if you look at the creative marketing tactics used to enroll these people i am sure there are a large % of elders enrolled in MA plans that dont need to be. Aside from low-income and rural areas, MA are not a WIN-WIN. Traditional medicare offers the same benefits to about 95% of seniors. MA works at best in 5% of cases.

Montana Man

June 27, 2008, 1:08pm (report abuse)

What are you people talking about. Seniors and minorities are insanely benefiting from these PFFS plans. I have over 100 people in these things and never seen ANY balance billing. The doctor is prohibited from doing that according to the terms and agreement of providing the service and billing the insurance company directly. HE CANNOT BALANCE BILL 10000 dollars! Not only are these plans better than orig. medicare but people that can afford supps. find these much more cost effective. Max out of pocket $2500/ year! thats almost what a medigap costs and that doesnt even have a premium! Beware democrats if you try to pull this crud when obama gets in seniors and the aarp are going to maybee take notice. Then your arse is grass! ha!

Geriatric Doc

June 28, 2008, 7:20am (report abuse)

Since our practice is 99% dependent on Medicare for our revenue,I have seriously considered getting out of practice entirely. There are already many docs who won't accept new Medicare patients in the office. Unfortunately those of us with training and expertise in caring for seniors will have even less incentive to practice our specialty.If doctors won't see these patients in the office, then they will all wind up going to the emergency room when they are ill, and they won't be getting good management of their chronic diseases or preventive services. It will also further increase the wait time and decrease quality of care in the ER. Not passing this bill will be a disaster! Unfortunately the ruling elite play by a different system, as they have open access for them and their families at military hospitals and can just show up and demand free care on the spot for them and their families.
Please contact your senators and ask them to vote yes for this bill.

Virginia

June 28, 2008, 6:51pm (report abuse)

I sell Medicare Advantage plans. Took me awhile to get on board with the plans, but knock on wood...so far so good. I too wonder how can the govt keep up with all of this. My cholesterol is high and my health insurance to get a decent plan will cost me $750 to $1,000 per month. Who can afford that...who can afford to be without? I do not know where we need to go with this, but I do think Medicare Supplements are the answer...except when my Dad's cost almost $300 per month for plan F. So I put him in Advantra Freedom for $98 per month. I do hold my breath every time he has anything done. In my area Doctors seem to be accepting the Med. Adv. plans without any questions...except Human Gold. Where do we go from here? I do like Med Adv for the people on Medicare under age 65, what else is there for them? At least let them keep the plan or allow them to get Med Sup. in open enrollment. Thanks.

frank tells

June 29, 2008, 3:28pm (report abuse)

I FEEL THAT THE MEDICARE BILL VOTED ON JULY 1, 2008 IS NOT BENEFICIAL TO PHYSICAL THERAPY PATIENTS. THE BILL SHOULD BE VOTED DOWN BECAUSE IT LIMITS THE NUMBER OF VISITS ALLOWED FOR PHYSICAL THERAPY. THE PATIENTS MEDICAL WELL BEING WILL BE JEOPARDIZED.

Texas Steve

June 30, 2008, 12:06am (report abuse)

I am a Family Physician and share call with 8 other family docs. We get calls every day from frustrated elderly who cannot find a doctor to accept Medicare (or Medicare Advantage). We have closed our doors to new Medicare in anticipation of the rate decrease. I will probably quit going to the nursing home. Three of my older call partner-colleagues (who have very heavy proportion of elderly patients) will likey retire earlier than planned. Two have chosen to close their doors as we have. Two others are going to send their patients notices that they will be no longer participating Medicare providers. The end result will be more use of emergency departments which costs more in the long run. The doctors who will still see Medicare will try to make up for the cuts by adding on Physician Assistants to incrase their patient volume.

GA BOY

June 30, 2008, 3:30am (report abuse)

Most MA plans pay 102%-104% of Medicare's fee schedule as well as they are electronically billed. This means that doctor's get their money in 30 days instead of 90 w/Medicare.
Sounds to me that they should bill more MA plans.
I realize that doctors are upset by this bill not passing, but it would harm to many seniors taking away the MA plans. I agree w/ the guy above who stated that we need to address the issues that increase health care and expenses to the doctors themselves. I have two friends who are doctors, who both retired early because they couldn't afford their malpractice insurance!
What a travesty!

Cardiologist

July 2, 2008, 10:40am (report abuse)

I am afraid that Standard of care will suffer and collapse Health care system. Costs of running practice is going up with way economy is, poor collection . This will be a great mess and unthinkable blunder

mkh

July 8, 2008, 9:19am (report abuse)

I believe that we are going to have a health care system breakdown if this bill is not passed. I do work for a primary care physician that make far less than the senators that are voting on this bill. What everyone does not seem to understand is that the majority of health insurances are tied to the rvu's that Medicare uses. That means a 10 percent cut across the board for physicians. I believe that the Senators need to spend some time in a family practice office to understand that we were just holding our heads above the waters as it was.

Entrench

July 8, 2008, 2:51pm (report abuse)

This only addresses a minor problem in the PFFS plans and does nothing to address healthcare's root problem which is unjust fee schedules all of which are based off of what Medicare pays. Even with that said this is a good bill with minor problems and that's coming from someone who works for a Medicare Advantage Plan. However don't let the well intentioned but poorly informed AMA frighten you, the solution to Medicare's woes lays in the private sector. The rapid expansion of Medicare benficiaries cannot be sustained by Federal funding and while not perfect we need to continue to pursue privatization as a means of maintaining Medicare without crippling physicians with horrific fee schedules.

Doc302

July 9, 2008, 3:11pm (report abuse)

Not all Medicare advantage plans are created Equal. Some are HMO or PPOs yet others are PFFS. Many Seniors do not know what they have signed up for.. They often believe that these are Medicare supplements not replacements. I have former patients that must travel 60 miles to see a participating specialist. These plans profit by blocking access to providers. Although there are some good PFFS MA plans most are just another way for insurance companies to make profit. Medicare is not perfect and if the fee schedule is cut may collapse. In their current incarnation, as system in which insurance companies profit from blocking access and forcing seniors to pay out of pocket to see a physician that would have taken Medicare assignment if the patient had stayed with traditional Medicare, Medicare advantage plans are not the solution. of course if you are UHC CEO William McGuire your $1.2 million salary, plus $165,000 ( 2005) new stock options may make you see it differently.

George James

July 9, 2008, 4:33pm (report abuse)

Citizens should watch to see who votes no on this bill and vote them out of office come November

INS. AGENT

July 9, 2008, 7:22pm (report abuse)

I must say that I really get tired of the ignorance of doctors.
PFFS plans ARE NOT PART OF A NETWORK! There are no participating providers. If you accept Medicare I can't think of a good reason why you would not accept a PFFS plan. They are based on Medicare's fee schedule. You bill them the same way, just with different codes.No one is blocking providers except you own stupid billing staff. As for Doctors accepting assignment and not taking MA plans...wakeup, that is exactly what MA plans are all about. THe biggest problem with PFFS plans (no so with contracted HMO,PPO plans) is the doctors failing to agree to bill the plan. How weak is that? I have insurance and a doctor won't agree to bill it? If a person has to drive 60 miles to find a doctor, is it because the local doc won't bill a plan the pays him 102% of Medicare's fee schedule should he take the time to bill it. I assume this doctor accept Medicare?

NC DME Provider

July 9, 2008, 9:38pm (report abuse)

When grandma, who is on medical oxygen at home, has to switch from her local independent durable medical equipment provider to one many miles away, what happens when she has a concern in the middle of the night with her equipment and the out of town provider takes hours to get to her? She will probably call on state-funded EMS services and local hospital's ER services. Too bad her previous local DME provider from down the road can not help her! Glad that the Senate passes Cloture HR 6331 today, they need to reform national competitive bidding!

doc302

July 10, 2008, 8:55am (report abuse)

INS Agent if you read the posts above you will find that it is the HMO and PPO/POS plans that block access and limit providers, not PFFS plans. medicare advantage plans consist of all of these plans not just PFFS.
Gqoted from medicare.GOV " Medicare Advantage Plans are health plan options that are part of the Medicare program. If you join one of these plans, you generally get all your Medicare-covered health care through that plan. This coverage can include prescription drug coverage. Medicare Advantage Plans include:

* Medicare Health Maintenance Organization (HMOs)
* Preferred Provider Organizations (PPO)
* Private Fee-for-Service Plans
* Medicare Special Needs Plans

INS AGENT

July 10, 2008, 9:43am (report abuse)

This bill does not address MA-HMO or MA PPO plans. Just MA-PFFS plans. PFFS plans allow you to go see "ANY" provider who will accept their terms and conditions. What are "their" terms?

1."Referrals or preauthorizations of health care services are not required.
2. Provider reimbursement is based on published Original Medicare rates, reimbursement guidelines and methodologies, less the member’s cost-sharing amounts. Medicare Local Medical Review Policies apply.
3. (your Company) PFFS directly reimburse physicians and other health care professionals for non-dual-eligible members. Reimbursement for dual-eligible members will be paid first by Medicare through (your comany) PFFS. The difference will be paid by Medicaid, up to the state payment limit.

4. Physicians, hospitals and other providers who render services to (your company) PFFS members must adhere to all industry standards and state and federal requirements.

The only person blocking access to a PFFS plan is you!

FlashRetro

July 10, 2008, 5:11pm (report abuse)

Yes, Fee For Service Advantage plans are good at any provider that will accept them. "Monopoly" money is also good at any provider that will accept it. In rural Oklahoma, the chances of either are about the same.

RONI

July 14, 2008, 11:57am (report abuse)

I AM INQUIRING ABOUT THE ACCREDITATION FOR PODIATRISTS THAT IS PART OF THIS BILL. DO THEY STILL HAVE TO OBTAIN ACCREDITATION? FROM WHAT I'VE SEEN ELSEWHERE THEY STILL HAVE TO BE ACCREDITED. CAN SOMEONE POST IF YOU KNOW. THANKS.

Muru

July 14, 2008, 5:14pm (report abuse)

Without this bill signed in to law, many doctors would stop taking new Medicare patients. Several would leave rural community based practices to join larger groups or hospitals in cities. As a result patients and families in particular elderly cancer patients would need to travel hundreds of miles for treatment.

spptmike

July 14, 2008, 5:50pm (report abuse)

Passing of HR 6331 is important to rehabilitation beneficiaries who choose seek services in an outpatient enviroment. They are presently capped at $1,810.00 per year which is roughly 12 - 15 visits per calender year, which is not enough for patients who are recovering from a CVA, orthopedic surgery, or sa debilative disease such a Parkinsons. Also, all medical providers of these services are asked to take a 10.6% pay cut for services which will create possible job losses for those who have substantial overhead. This imposed cap is arbitrary, unconstitutional, and restricts the provider to base care on finances instead of need. We all suffer if the health care system becomes a budgetary game instead of providing the quality care we were trained to perform.

Bill M

July 15, 2008, 3:21pm (report abuse)

It's to bad the president vetoed this Bill. Does he not care what its for.

AL Gal

July 15, 2008, 4:20pm (report abuse)

How many of you will be decreasing staff, and hours to absorb the cut? How many will stop taking Medicare? This is bad for the seniors, Veterans and Physicians.

MA can cost seniors more money in the long run. Medicare 20% patient responsibility for an office visit can run between $7.00 to $23.00 depending on location and service. While with MA seniors have flat co-pay of $30.00 and up.

I have had many low income patients confused to why they are now paying more per visit than when they had the standard Medicare.

I which the politicians would come spend a week with me!!

Tony P

July 15, 2008, 9:14pm (report abuse)

Thank fully this finally passed with veto override. It amazes me to see how many educated people do not realize how poorly designed this system is. Pharmacies are blamed for drug costs when a drug companies actually set the prices. General practitioners are punished by insurers for excessive costs charged by specialists, and then hit again for malpractice insurance. Insurance companies are given nearly free control to run Medicare-D making record profits while providing little real benefit to the patients, and running many independent pharmacies out of business with unreasonable reimbursements and slow payments. This was only a small step toward the level of reform that is needed. There is so much to fix that our great-grandchildren may not see real improvement.

Ezara

July 16, 2008, 11:24am (report abuse)

The more they fool with the system the worse it seems to get, finally they have made at least some improvement.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)