How People Voted
20% For, 80% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 6329, To expedite the construction of new refining capacity on brownfield sites in the United States, and for other purposes
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on June 21, 2008, 19:30:23 (webmaster), with revision saved on September 19, 2008, 19:32:54 (webmaster):
H.R. 6329 would expedite the construction of new refining capacity on brownfield sites in the United States.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(Log in to editRequires the wikiSecretary of Energy to designate at least five brownfield sites (or portions of them) that are appropriate and beavailable for siting a refinery for gasoline or other fuel.
Designates the firstDepartment of Energy as the lead agency for coordinating applicable federal refinery authorizations and related environmental reviews with respect to provide a detailed summarydesignated refinery.
Gives the U.S. Court of Appeals for the bill!)District of Columbia exclusive jurisdiction over civil actions relating to federal refinery authorizations.
Amends the Internal Revenue Code to extend until January 1, 2017, the election to expense certain refineries.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 6/20/2008: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
There are currently no comments for this bill.