How People Voted
 |
 |
18% For, 82% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 6156, The Eastern Sierra and Northern San Gabriel Wild Heritage Act
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Version saved on June 10, 2008, 19:30:38, by webmaster:
H.R. 6156 would designate certain land as wilderness in the State of California.
Detailed Summary
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
Status of the Legislation
Latest Major Action: 5/30/2008: Referred to House subcommittee. Status: Referred to the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands.
Points in Favor
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
Points Against
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
John
July 1, 2008, 12:12am (report abuse)Barbara Boxer and her communist friends are doing everything they can to block off all access for outdoosmen and women. These are shameless anti gun groups that have found a way to restrict our access to extremely rugged areas making it almost impossible to hunt or fish on OUR lands. We must band together to fight these communists and get our countries public lands back in our control. Make sure when the time comes to vote these heartless humans out of office.
randy
August 23, 2008, 5:11pm (report abuse)This is a poorly thought out piece of legislation that will prevent access to all except a few. As our population ages it becomes more and more difficult for baby boomers to get around and the area they are affecting will become less accessible for a large segment of the population. This flys in the face of ADA, should we allow access to everyone? This bill will at least be the beginning of limiting access to all but a few.