Home

Blog

How People Voted

22% For, 78% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 6131, To provide incentives for the production and use of unconventional aviation fuels

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on August 5, 2008, 19:33:33 (webmaster):

H.R. 6131 would provide incentives for the production and use of unconventional aviation fuels.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log in to editAmends the wikiInternal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow an unconventional aviation fuel mixture credit. Defines &quot;unconventional aviation fuel mixture&quot; as an aviation-grade fuel consisting of a mixture of unconventional fuel (any liquid fuel derived from coal and beany oil produced from shale) and aviation-grade kerosene.

Authorizes
the firstSecretary of Defense to provide a detailed summaryenter into contracts or other agreements to procure liquid fuel derived from coal to meet the fuel requirements of the bill!)Department of Defense (DOD), including multi-year contracts for up to 25 years.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
(Log inLatest Major Action: 6/23/2008: Referred to edit the wiki and be the firstHouse subcommittee. Status: Referred to update the status of the bill!)Subcommittee on Readiness.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)