Home

Blog

How People Voted

29% For, 71% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 6018, To amend title 10, United States Code, to increase loan repayment limits for health professionals serving in the Armed Forces

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on May 9, 2008, 19:30:14 (webmaster), with revision saved on July 25, 2008, 19:33:20 (webmaster):

H.R. 6018 would amend title 10, United States Code, to increase loan repayment limits for health professionals serving in the Armed Forces.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(LogAmends provisions authorizing educational loan repayment in exchange for service as a health professional in to edit the wikiSelected Reserved of an armed force and determined to be the firstneeded critically in order to provide a detailed summarymeet identified wartime combat medical skill shortages to limit payment amounts to $60,000 (currently, $20,000) per year of service. Eliminates provisions limiting the bill!)total amount that may be repaid on behalf of any person to $50,000.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 5/8/2008:5/23/2008: Referred to House committee.subcommittee. Status: Referred to the House CommitteeSubcommittee on Armed Services.Military Personnel.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)