Home

Blog

How People Voted

47% For, 53% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-140, The CLEAN Energy Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on June 20, 2007, 17:48:34 (webmaster), with revision saved on June 21, 2007, 17:48:23 (webmaster):

H.R. 6 would reduce our Nation's dependency on foreign oil by investing in clean, renewable, and alternative energy resources, promoting new emerging energy technologies, developing greater efficiency, and creating a Strategic Energy Efficiency and Renewables Reserve to invest in alternative energy.

== Detailed Summary ==


<summary>
Creating Long-Term Energy Alternatives for the Nation Act of 2007, or the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007 - '''Title I: Denial of Oil and Gas Tax Benefits''' - Ending Subsidies for Big Oil Act of 2007 - Amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 with respect to the deduction from gross income of any income attributable to domestic production activities. Excludes from domestic production gross receipts those derived from the sale, exchange, or other disposition of oil, natural gas, or any related primary product. (Thus denies a deduction for income attributable to domestic production of oil, natural gas, or their related primary products.)<br>

(Sec. 103) Increases from five to seven years the amortization schedule for geological and geophysical expenditures for certain major integrated oil companies.

'''Title II: Royalties Under Offshore Oil and Gas Leases''' - Royalty Relief for American Consumers Act of 2007 - (Sec. 202) Instructs the Secretary of the Interior to agree to any lessee request to amend any lease issued for any Central and Western Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) tract during 1998 and 1999 to incorporate specified price thresholds applicable to royalty suspension provisions.

(Sec. 203) Reaffirms the authority of the Secretary to vary, based on the price of production from a lease, the suspension of royalties under specified leases on the Outer Continental Shelf.

(Sec. 204) Cites conditions for the issuance of new leases authorizing oil or natural gas production in the Gulf. Requires lessees to have: (1) renegotiated each covered lease to modify payment responsibilities to include price thresholds equal to or less than specified price thresholds; or (2) paid all conservation of resources fees or agreed to pay them. Applies the same conditions to the transfer to any such lessee (or any other person with an interest in a lease) of any other covered lease, the economic benefit of such a lease, or any other lease for the production of oil or natural gas in the Gulf.

Instructs the Secretary to establish conservation of resources fees for both producing and nonproducing federal oil and gas leases in the Gulf.



(Sec. 205) Amends the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal: (1) specified incentives for natural gas production from deep wells in shallow waters of the Gulf; (2) royalty relief for deep water production in the Gulf; and (3) the prohibition on cost recovery fees for drilling-related permit application during the Federal Permit Streamlining Pilot Project.

Amends the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to remove the Planning Areas Offshore Alaska from the list of areas for which the Secretary is authorized to reduce or eliminate any royalty or net profit share set forth in the pertinent lease.

Amends the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 to repeal provisions governing oil and gas leasing in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska regarding: (1) renewal of competitive oil and gas leases, with or without discoveries; and (2) waiver, suspension, or reduction of rental fees or royalties on leaseholds as exploration incentives.

'''Title III: Strategic Energy Efficiency And Renewables Reserve - ('''Sec. 301) Establishes the Strategic Energy Efficiency and Renewables Reserve to hold federal receipts acquired as a result of the enactment of this Act.

Makes the Reserve available to offset the costs of subsequent legislation to: (1) accelerate the use of clean domestic renewable energy resources and alternative fuels; (2) promote the utilization of energy-efficient products and practices and conservation; and (3) increase research, development, and deployment of clean renewable energy and efficiency technologies.

Sets forth procedures for adjustments to discretionary spending limits, allocations, and budget aggregates under the appropriate concurrent resolution on the budget in the event that legislation provides funding for the Reserve in excess of amounts provided for FY2007 purposes.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==


<status>
Latest Major Action: 6/19/2007:6/20/2007: Senate floor actions. Status: Cloture motion on the bill presented inConsidered by Senate.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

neil

January 23, 2007, 7:59am (report abuse)

You wrote:

> It would amend the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 to repeal provisions governing oil and gas leasing in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska

The statement neglects to mention whether the change promotes or protects.

Webmaster

January 23, 2007, 8:39am (report abuse)

Thank you for your comment, Neil. The information in our summary is from the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, which is itself unclear on this point. We are working on ways to make more, better information about the meanings of bills available. Sorry for the lack of clarity on your question at this point.

Neil

January 23, 2007, 8:47am (report abuse)

Hi Webmaster.
I'm not good at legalspeak. I'm glad to hear I wasn't having a reading-comprehension problem. :)
Thanks.

Neil

January 23, 2007, 9:26am (report abuse)

Well, my Hon. Rep. Kajorski voted For the bill. So I sent him an email asking for a translation of the Alaskan issue. If he replies, I'll let you know.
Thanks.

Charles

January 29, 2007, 8:41am (report abuse)

This bill seems to be a good first step, but I worry about the possible mis-appropriation of funds. There is nothing outlining where the $$ is to be spent and by whom.

Neil

January 31, 2007, 10:04am (report abuse)

Well, that was all January 23rd.

Today is Jan 31, and no reply from my representitive.

Either he doesn't know, or he doesn't care.

:|
-Neil-

Ken

May 19, 2007, 9:05pm (report abuse)

They don't care anymore. They care about staying in office, and corporate campaign contributions get/keep them in office.

Votes aren't counted anymore, only dollars. Peace.

DAVEA0511

May 20, 2007, 6:15pm (report abuse)

Charles -

You hit the nail on the head, and that's always been the #1 problem with "clean energy" government programs. No effort is made to intelligently and honestly determine the most viable clean energy solutions for fund appropriation. As a result almost all of it goes to waste on eternally unviable solutions or solutions that merely shift the polution from one industry to another (example: hydrogen generation).

McAdams

December 10, 2007, 11:34am (report abuse)

The voters should insist upon the "Honesty and Clarity in Naming Bills Act."
Not that many years ago, a CLEAN Energy Act would have all petro forms. Now, it just means decimating the nation's last remaining rain forest.

McAdams

December 10, 2007, 11:36am (report abuse)

"precluded" all petro forms, that is....

TIE

July 20, 2008, 5:49pm (report abuse)

good point DAVE0511. When a problem has been identified the (possible)Solutions are what is needed.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)