See How Your Representatives Voted:
See Related Bills:
See Bills on the Same Subject:
Actions and defenses, Administrative fees, Administrative procedure, Agricultural subsidies, Agricultural wastes, Agriculture, Air conditioning, Air pollution, Air pollution control, Alaska, Alcohol as fuel, Alternative energy sources, Antitrust law, Automobile engines, Automobile tires, Automobiles, Balanced budgets, Biological research, Biomass energy, Budgets, Building construction, Business, Capitol (Washington, D.C.), Carbon cycle, Carbon dioxide, Cartels, Cellulose, China, Climate change, Cogeneration of electric power and heat, Compensation (Law), Congress, Congressional reporting requirements, Consumer education, Consumer protection, Consumers, Cost effectiveness, Data banks, Department of Commerce, Department of Energy, Department of Transportation, Depreciation and amortization, Diesel motor, East Asia, Education, Electric batteries, Electric power plants, Electric power production, Electric power transmission, Electric utilities, Electric vehicles, Elementary and secondary education, Emergency management, Energy, Energy conservation, Energy conservation in buildings, Energy crops, Energy efficiency, Energy facilities, Energy prices, Energy research, Energy security, Energy storage, Energy supplies, Energy transportation, Environmental protection, Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental research, Executive departments, Executive Office of the President, Executive reorganization, Federal advisory bodies, Federal aid to Indians, Federal aid to research, Federal budgets, Federal office buildings, Federal officials, Federally-guaranteed loans, Fees, Fines (Penalties), Foreign policy, Fossil fuels, Fuel consumption, Gas in submerged lands, Gas industry, General Services Administration, Geology, Geophysical prediction, Geothermal resources, Government employees, Government information, Government liability (International law), Government paperwork, Government publicity, Government spending reductions, Government trust funds, Governmental investigations, Green products, Greenhouse gases, Gulf of Mexico, H.R.2635, H.R.2701, H.R.3221, H.R.4773, Heat pumps, Hydroelectric power, Income tax, India, Indians, Infrastructure, Infrastructure (Economics), Injunctions, International affairs, International competitiveness, Labeling, Law, Legislation, Liability for nuclear damages, Licenses, Lighting, Marine resources, Marine resources conservation, Market manipulation, Methane, Minorities, Motor vehicle pollution control, Motor vehicle safety, Natural gas, Natural resources, Nuclear energy, Ocean energy resources, Oil and gas leases, Oil and gas royalties, Oils and fats, Petroleum, Petroleum in submerged lands, Petroleum industry, Pipelines, Price fixing, Profit, Prospecting, Public contracts, Railroad freight operations, Reformulated gasoline, Refuse as fuel, Research and development, Research and development facilities, Research centers, Research grants, Restrictive trade practices, S.103, S.1656, S.1771, School buildings, School health programs, Science policy, Solar energy, Solid wastes, South Asia, Standards, Subsidies, Tax credits, Tax deductions, Taxation, Technological innovations, Technology, Trade, Transportation, Trucks, Water resources, Western Hemisphere, Wind power (more subjects ↓)
See Bills in the Same Budget Category:
Tax and Revenue, Energy, Agriculture, Transportation
Visitor Comments
neil
You wrote:
> It would amend the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976 to repeal provisions governing oil and gas leasing in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska
The statement neglects to mention whether the change promotes or protects.
Webmaster
Thank you for your comment, Neil. The information in our summary is from the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, which is itself unclear on this point. We are working on ways to make more, better information about the meanings of bills available. Sorry for the lack of clarity on your question at this point.
Neil
Hi Webmaster.
I'm not good at legalspeak. I'm glad to hear I wasn't having a reading-comprehension problem. :)
Thanks.
Neil
Well, my Hon. Rep. Kajorski voted For the bill. So I sent him an email asking for a translation of the Alaskan issue. If he replies, I'll let you know.
Thanks.
Charles
This bill seems to be a good first step, but I worry about the possible mis-appropriation of funds. There is nothing outlining where the $$ is to be spent and by whom.
Neil
Well, that was all January 23rd.
Today is Jan 31, and no reply from my representitive.
Either he doesn't know, or he doesn't care.
:|
-Neil-
Ken
They don't care anymore. They care about staying in office, and corporate campaign contributions get/keep them in office.
Votes aren't counted anymore, only dollars. Peace.
DAVEA0511
Charles -
You hit the nail on the head, and that's always been the #1 problem with "clean energy" government programs. No effort is made to intelligently and honestly determine the most viable clean energy solutions for fund appropriation. As a result almost all of it goes to waste on eternally unviable solutions or solutions that merely shift the polution from one industry to another (example: hydrogen generation).
McAdams
The voters should insist upon the "Honesty and Clarity in Naming Bills Act."
Not that many years ago, a CLEAN Energy Act would have all petro forms. Now, it just means decimating the nation's last remaining rain forest.
McAdams
"precluded" all petro forms, that is....
TIE
good point DAVE0511. When a problem has been identified the (possible)Solutions are what is needed.