What People Think
 |
 |
21% For, 79% Against
Take Action
| Vote on this Bill | |
  |
For |
  |
Against |
| Speak Out | |
  |
Comment on this Bill |
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 5889, The Orphan Works Act of 2008
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
Trackback URL: http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/trackback/110_HR_5889.html
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Lenn Long
As a photographer any legislation that takes my rights as image creator away from me I cannot support.
This bill in its current form has such vague and wide sweeping language it essentially disolves the entire copyright lawbook.
Jim
I support this Bill.
Fair use has been gutted, we can have a private free exchange of information on the internet or we can have copyright laws. There is not room for both.
I will not sacrifice freedom of speech, privacy and the basic realities of the internet to maintain outdated business models.
Josh
This bill is nothing. HR 4279 is our worse nightmare. The Ray Charles MP3s and the Peanuts comic strips may soon become public domain.
Bill from NYC
We're not talking about outdated business models. We're talking about people who will say they performed a diligent search for the owner of a copyright, when in fact they did not, and they will pay the limit of damages as a discounted fee for the use of the work in question. Anyone who makes their living as an artist already has issues with keeping their work safeguarded from theft...this Orphan Works bill, if signed into law, will just legalize it.
Diana in NYC
While I have no problem with NON-profit museums, schools and archivist having easier access to old, forgotten works, I do have serious issues with the broad sweep of the brush this new OW bill has been created with. They have opened the floodgates for large, onerous FOR PROFIT companies (and freeloading smaller entities) to manipulate and use the bill/law to their own commercial advantage, which would be devastating to the small creative arts business community. This has nothing to do with freedom of speech (privacy would be out the window if anyone can grab and use personal family photos that are not properly 'registered'), but all to do with valuable properties that dubious companies look to take advantage of FOR PROFIT if this bill passes. It needs to be seriously overhauled for it to be fair to all honestly involved.
Jeremy McHugh
This bill ignores the Berne Convention. It tosses a creator's rights into the wind by removing the assumption that a creator's work is their own to do with as they please.The fallout of this bill's passing would be international. Other countries that follow the Berne Convention would find their creators equally at a loss as to how to protect their interests.The hoped-for commercial registries that Orphan works legislation assumes will arise to make this ill-conceived system function will be wide open for abuse. The bill's wording practically reads as a "how-to" manual for copyright infringement.
Copyright is not an obstacle to free speech as some would like to assert when clouding the issue. Copyright is a right of property and privacy and both will be in jeopardy if this bill is allowed to pass.
Jtaylor83
This bill has nothing to do with the Berne Convention. Pro-IP (HR 4279) is an obstacle of a person freedom to live. Pro-IP will allow the RIAA, MPAA, WGA, Anime Artists, game companies, and celebrities to own your house even if you do not own a computer or any other device that infringes copyright.
Edtropolis
Diana, this bill does not include personal material belongings such as your family photos. I wouldn't worry about this bill because Pro-IP is killing fair-use and the second amendment. If you're worried, then sell your stuff (including the clothes on your body) and go live in the woods. Your Jesus cannot save you anymore, he died 2000 years ago and he's still dead today.
Lisa
Edtropolis, this bill would indeed impact personal material, as well as any other material on the web. The term 'orphan' is never defined in the text of the bill itself, except to say that the creator could not be found. So it could be any type of visual art at all: old, new, foreign. Any image recently scrapped off of any website could be labeled 'orphan' so long as a 'diligent' search was conducted to find the creator (someone please tell me how this could possibly be done!).
Here's another thing to think about since this bill is aimed at creating an exception for non profits. Of the 19 states that actually DO have privacy laws none of them will protect your personal photos from unauthorized use by a non-profit organization.
Since when do we advocate socialism and slavery? The right of a human being to profit from his/her labor is an essential human right! I for one don't enjoy working only to give it all away instead of cashing the paycheck.
ps
The only thing protecting your family photos right now is the fact that we enjoy the protection of 'passive copyright' which means no signature or registration is required you own it and control it from the moment you create it whether it's a photo or sketch. No one touches it without your permission. That's what the Berne Convention did for us and this bill will undo all of that.
Working artist
How am I outdated? How is making a living outdated? This idea that I'm not allowed to work for money, and that everyone can do whatever they want with my things is all well and good as long as SOMEBODY GIVES ME ENOUGH MONEY TO EAT AND PUT A ROOF OVER MY HEAD. Otherwise what you are talking about is theft, Jim, and not your precious Communism.