Home

Blog

How People Voted

17% For, 83% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 5770, To provide for a study by the National Academy of Sciences of potential impacts of climate change on water resources and water quality

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on June 5, 2008, 19:32:15 (webmaster), with revision saved on June 10, 2008, 19:32:00 (webmaster):

H.R. 5770 would provide for a study by the National Academy of Sciences of potential impacts of climate change on water resources and water quality.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
(Log inDirects the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to editarrange for the wikiNational Academy of Sciences to prepare a two-part study of potential impacts of climate change on water resources and bewater quality, addressing issues of: (1) hydrology and water quality (including the firstpotential for impacts to providewetlands, shoreline erosion, and saltwater intrusion as a detailed summaryresult of sea level rise, as well as significant regional variation in precipitation events from historic patterns); and (2) policy considerations (including an identification of the bill!)scientific consensus, assumptions, and uncertainties related to predictions of climate change in the United States and of steps to assess emerging information and identify appropriate response actions).
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 6/4/2008: Reported by the Committee on Transportation. H. Rept. 110-685, Part I.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)