Home

Blog

How People Voted

28% For, 72% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-185, The Recovery Rebates and Economic Stimulus for the American People Act of 2008

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on February 5, 2008, 19:47:55 (CarolB), with revision saved on February 14, 2008, 18:43:13 (webmaster):

H.R. 5140 would provide economic stimulus through recovery rebates to individuals, incentives for business investment, and an increase in conforming and FHA loan limits.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Recovery Rebates and Economic Stimulus for<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the American People ActSenate on February 7, 2008. The summary of 2008 - that version is repeated here.)</b>

'''TitleEconomic Stimulus Act of 2008 - T<b>itle I: Recovery Rebates and Incentives for Business Investment'''Investment</b> - (Sec. 101) Amends the Internal Revenue Code to grant tax rebates of the lesser of net income tax liability or $600 to individual taxpayers ($1,200 for married taxpayers filing joint returns). Allows additional rebates of $300 for each child of an eligible taxpayer.

(Sec. 101) Amends the Internal Revenue Code to grant tax rebates of the lesser of net income tax liability or $600 to individual taxpayers ($1,200 for married taxpayers filing joint returns). Allows additional rebates of $300 for each child of an eligible taxpayer.

Provides
Provides for a minimum tax rebate of $300 ($600 for married taxpayers filing joint returns) for taxpayers with earned income of at least $3,000. Includes social security retirement benefits and compensation and pension benefits paid to disabled veterans for purposes of determining income eligibility for rebates.

Reduces the amount of such rebates by 5% of the amount that exceeds an adjusted gross income of $75,000 ($150,000 for married taxpayers filing joint returns).

Directs the Secretary of the Treasury to pay tax rebates as rapidly as possible. ProhibitsProhibits: (1) payment of rebates after December 31, 2008.2008; and (2) payment of a rebate to a taxpayer without a valid identification number (i.e., social security number).

Provides for payment of comparable tax rebates to residents of the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico and the Northern Mariana Islands.

Provides that the payment of a tax rebate shall not be considered income for purposes of determining eligibility for federal and federally-assisted state benefit programs.


Makes appropriations for FY2008 to implement payment of the tax rebates. Directs the Secretary to submit a plan and quarterly reports to the Senate and House Committees on Appropriations on actual and expected expenditures of appropriated funds.

(Sec. 102) Increases in 2008: (1) the expensing allowance for depreciable business assets to $250,000; and (2) the maximum investment phase-out threshold for such expensing allowance to $800,000.

(Sec. 103) Increases to 50% (from 30%) the amount of the adjusted basis of certain depreciable property (e.g., equipment and computer software) that may be claimed as a deductible expense in 2008.

'''Title<b>Title II: Housing GSE and FHA Loan Limits'''Limits</b> -

(Sec.
(Sec. 201) Raises the statutory ceiling on the maximum original principal obligation of a mortgage originated between July 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008, that may be purchased by either the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac). Disregards mortgages purchased with the increased ceiling amount for purposes of meeting certain housing goals established under the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992.

Expresses the sense of Congress that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should securitize mortgages acquired pursuant to the increased conforming loan limits of this Act if the manner of securitization does not: (1) impose additional costs for mortgages originated, purchased, or securitized under existing limits; or (2) interfere with the goal of adding liquidity to the market.

(Sec. 202) Establishes a temporary loan limit increase for FHA-insured mortgages in specified high-cost areas for which a borrower received credit approval by December 31, 2008.

Grants the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) discretionary authority to increase loan limits in 2008 based upon the size and location of residences in particular areas.

Directs the Secretary to publish the median house prices and mortgage principal obligation limits as revised by this Act not later than 30 days after its enactment.

<b>Title III: Emergency Designation</b> - Designates all provisions of this Act as emergency requirements and necessary to meet emergency needs for certain budgetary purposes.

</summary>

<!-- Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 2/4/2008: Senate floor actions. Status: Cloture on the motion to proceed to the measure invoked in Senate2/13/2008: Signed by Yea-Nay Vote. 80 - 4. Record Vote Number: 5.President.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

This bill will inject nearly 156 billion dollars into the US economy (house version). It isn't designed to give everyone a rebate, just those who statistically will spend it the way it needs to be spent in order to boost the economy.

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass! If you hate the bill, voice your reasoning here.)

<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Savings per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Roger

January 30, 2008, 3:06pm (report abuse)

anything for those who didn't make enough to pay tax's, like seniors and homeless vets?

smith

February 4, 2008, 11:45am (report abuse)

Stop breaking the economy then trying to give the people hush money! This is ridiculous! The reasons for the economic downturn are still there. (The FED, the War, the unconstitutional spending.)

Suzanne

February 4, 2008, 3:29pm (report abuse)

This is ridiculous. They are putting everyone in the same category when it comes to income! Don't they know that it costs more to live in some parts of the country than others? The ADJ Gross is too low!

Brad

February 4, 2008, 7:15pm (report abuse)

How is this a savings? They aren't going to not spend money and instead just give it back to us. The government will still spend all the tax money. They'll just borrow more to give us the cash. To finace this they have to sell bonds to China, just so Americans can use the money to buy more stuff from China that we don't need. Great way to save the economy, run up the deficit and encourage americans to spend frivilously instead of saving.

Follow-up

February 5, 2008, 9:00am (report abuse)

Roger: The senate version, yes, house version, no.

Smith: Get a life and learn something about economics.

Suzanne: It is not a hard cap at 75,000/150,000, but a reduction by 5% for every part of a taxpayers AGI over 75,000/150,000 (making the cap effectively 87,000/174,000 (higher with children). Married individuals need not worry, 150,000+ is a lot of money no matter where you live in the US. They based the cap on who is likely to actually inject the money into the economy. History has shown them the appropriate place for the caps.

Brad: Get a life and learn something about economics.

Kathy

February 9, 2008, 11:33am (report abuse)

Follow-up: "higher with children." What is the cap for married couple with 3 children? I can't find this anywhere.

Follow-up

February 9, 2008, 4:00pm (report abuse)

Kathy: the cap, if you are referring to the maximum you would be eligible to get in your rebate check, would be the base ($600/$1200) plus $300 for each child so $1500/$2100 (individual/married). According to the final version of the bill.

If you are referring to the maximum that you can make before you lose tha ability to take part in the rebate, it is the same (I mistyped my previous comment, it won't let me edit once posted).

Kathy

February 9, 2008, 5:24pm (report abuse)

Follow-up Thanks so much.

Kathy

February 9, 2008, 5:27pm (report abuse)

Follow Up: Just to clarify that 174,000 is hard cap and doesn't change even if you have children right?

Brent

February 9, 2008, 5:38pm (report abuse)

This IS ridiculous. As I read the bill, it appears that this will just be a "loan" against your 2008 taxes, unless of course you don't pay taxes. Then it is just a gift. I wish they would have required that the names of each person who wont be getting the loan would be printed on the checks. "This check compliments of..." If I get one of these checks, I will send it right back because I would have to repay it in 2009 anyway.

Follow-up

February 10, 2008, 3:06pm (report abuse)

Kathy: It all really depends on how you do your taxes. The 174,000 is based on your "net income tax liability" which in some cases could be significantly lower than your actual gross pay. It is based on tax law, which can be complicated. A tax professional could probably explain the full details, however your rgoss income is never lower (i think) than your "net income tax liability". (I hope that makes sense).

Brent: This is NOT a loan against your 2008 taxes, it is a rebate, you never pay it back. The idea behind it is for you to take some of the government's money and go on a shopping spree to boost the economy.

For those of you who complain "Why am I not getting a piece" or whatever, this is not a welfare check, cost of living offset, or any other method designed to improve your financial situation or help pay bills. This is a way the government has designed to hopefully boost the economy, nothing more.

Follow-up

February 10, 2008, 3:21pm (report abuse)

My mistake, I meant "Adjusted Gross Income" rather than "net income tax liability"

For example, educator expenses, IRA deduction, student loan interest, and tuition and fees are all deductions that may help reduce your "Adjusted Gross Income".

Gary

February 11, 2008, 9:18am (report abuse)

like huckabee said were getting the
money from china. said this two
weeks ago

Janice

February 11, 2008, 9:53am (report abuse)

The American people are not as stupid as some people think. We are sick us Bush's plans to bankrupt our country in order to stuff the pockets of special interests and foreigners.

Jonathan

February 11, 2008, 11:29am (report abuse)

Follow-up: "The idea behind it is for you to take some of the government's money and go on a shopping spree to boost the economy."

Erm, hate to say this, but it's not the government's money, it's ours (assuming you're a tax payer). You might wish to review your response to Brad.

Pat

February 11, 2008, 12:04pm (report abuse)

People that pay taxes should receive a check. WHY should they be penalized or give someone their rebate when that person never pay taxes. These people need that money just as much.

bonniebleau

February 11, 2008, 2:35pm (report abuse)

Here we go again. I guess we'll be borrowing money from China to give stupid Amerikans a token of their income taxes back so they can go out and spend it on something made in china! Only our government could come up with such a brilliant plan. meanwhile, we have people complaining that they may not get their fair share. Give me a break. Our founding fathers must be rolling over in their graves.

J A Swidergal

February 11, 2008, 3:00pm (report abuse)

Now if they really wanted to juice up the economy give us all a million dollar grant. That would be nice!

radredhead

February 12, 2008, 9:16am (report abuse)

The economy is in the dumper because Americans are hooked on spending. They buy houses they can't afford, drive cars that guzzle gas...and the government's answer is a little crack nugget to keep us hooked. Screw that, I'm putting my rebate in the bank where it will earn some money for me!

Follow-up

February 12, 2008, 11:41am (report abuse)

For Kathy and anyone else confused about the "caps", here is a link to an article explaining this bill who is eligible as well as what the caps are.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/02/12/BUOAV0BJP.D...

micky

February 12, 2008, 1:09pm (report abuse)

Let's see, the country is deep in debt, the dollar is losing value daily, so now GW is going to go deeper in dept (further devaluing the dollar) to help the economy. God help us! Our rulers are morons!

Bill

February 14, 2008, 3:29pm (report abuse)

$174,000 is not a lot of money if you live in NYC, have doctorate level loans and recent mortgage and have 5 kids. Im a democrat that just turned Republican on this.

jacob messer

February 15, 2008, 11:56pm (report abuse)

I don't agree with this at all... but what can we do?

I'm just sending it to Ron Paul's campaign fund. You want someone to fix the economy and open your eyes people because there is no one as qualified and I dont think anyone's punked Bernake as much as Dr. Paul does.

Gary

February 19, 2008, 9:27am (report abuse)

jacob looks like paul
is out of the pic.. they don't show him he's not a front runner
this is bushs' way of covering his butt, we need a democrate in office

bonniebleau

February 19, 2008, 11:43am (report abuse)

Jacob, what a fantastic way to spend this money. I believe I may just do the same thing OR now I have several people (in the Ron Paul fashion), that have also decided to run for office. It might help them get started! Thanks for the idea!

bonniebleau

February 19, 2008, 11:47am (report abuse)

Gary
McCain is a fascist
Hillary is a socialist
Obama is a communist

don't believe me check out his churches website and the History of Disporia and Hillary, OMG, all the scandels and dead bodies from the Clinton Administration are piled high. McCain is just a fascist neocon who hopefully is on his meds!

Smith

February 19, 2008, 12:16pm (report abuse)

Follow-Up: Learn something about history. The FED is the reason the Great Depression occurred, and it is the reason it will occur again. Bills such as this will not "boost the economy." Most people will save this money or spend it paying bills. Thge reason the economy is going down the drain is because Congress delegated the Constitutional authority to regulate the value of money to a private bank. This is a very foolish thing to do, and it is illegal under the Constitution of our country. This bill does not treat the problems, just the symptoms of the economy. The way to fix this is to return to the standards dictated by the Constitution.

Smith

February 19, 2008, 12:17pm (report abuse)

McCain is a fascist?
Hillary is a socialist?
Obama is a communist?

Finally, someone else that understands!

Molotov

February 19, 2008, 4:46pm (report abuse)

They could have saved the rebate checks, kept the re-fi stipulations and business deductions, and called it good enough for now. But, since it is my money anyway, I will be using it for items built in the USA. In addition, IT'S AN ELECTION YEAR PEOPLE, they have to buy your votes.

Just wait for the Dems to take the Presidency. This country will be in even worse shape with all the social plans of the Democrat "SAVIORS". Raise your taxes, raise business taxes, business is "EVIL", jobs cut further, etc etc etc.

Kathy2

February 19, 2008, 8:03pm (report abuse)

Maybe they should consider fixing incomes and education and the ridicules cost of health insurance and health care instead of costing the public more money to "give back" money.

Brian-NJ

February 19, 2008, 11:04pm (report abuse)

Reverse psychology works. The money which everyone assumes is to stimulate the economy will go in the bank by everyone behind in bills and everyone looking to spite. There is no money for lenders to lend, they are getting some from sovereign funds but what better place to get it then get it back from where yo lent it.

C. J. Lingo

February 25, 2008, 6:56pm (report abuse)

It is amazing that our elected representatives are able to find One Hundred Sixty Eight Billion dollars of "Vote Buying" money but are completely unable to find the Twenty Billion dollars or so that we should be spending annually to restore our United States Air Force aircraft. Almost all of our military aircraft have greatly exceeded their design life.

Spending the money on what we need would also stimulate the economy as well as insure that we will be around long enough to enjoy the benefits.

rsw

March 28, 2008, 3:05pm (report abuse)

Anyone know how someone truly homeless without an address can get the stimulus check?

llm

April 28, 2008, 12:08pm (report abuse)

Wow, I can't wait to get my $600 dollars - I can buy gas to get to work for one week!!! or maybe pay my electric bill - how much fun!!!

TAMMY

May 8, 2008, 10:01am (report abuse)

WHAT IF I WENT TO H R BLOCK AND HAD MY TAXES DONE HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE ME TO GET MY REBATE CHECK TO ME BECAUSE I FILL THEM REALLY EARLY LIKE THE 2 WEEK WHEN IT CAME OUT

Avon Barksdale

July 16, 2008, 6:44pm (report abuse)

How am I stimulating the economy when the IRS applied my $600 to back taxes that I am not delinquent on? I was audited from 2002 to 2006. I was notified by the IRS via letter in 2006 of this audit and set up a payment plan. I have been paying for over 2yrs now. I do not owe any Federal student loans, and I don't have any kids, so child support is not due either. Today, 07/16/2008 the IRS was incapable of explaining to me why I am not getting my stimulus. They did give me the public law code, and that's it. I would like to know the exact explanation within the bill that states the money sent to me to stimulate the economy is in fact subject to stimulate the IRS instead. Also, an explanation of where this money is coming from would be appreciated. Last I checked the US is in 9-trillion-something dollars in debt to itself???

Penny

November 10, 2008, 5:37pm (report abuse)

I feel that, like the previous stimulus checks that did not do any good, this is a bad idea. I am retired and have lost a great deal in my IRA's and nobody is bailing me or any of the others in the same boat out. I still pay taxes and feel anyone who does not pay Federal Income Tax should not be entitled to a rebate period.
Extra money is always nice but not when it has to be borrowed from China or elsewhere.

Rich W

November 14, 2008, 2:56pm (report abuse)

Of course, if you owe Uncle Sam anything - anything AT ALL - like, for example, a 25 yr. old student loan payment, be prepared for whatever you might get to be applied towards that ancient debt. Stimulus, indeed...

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)