Home

Blog

How People Voted

33% For, 67% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-360, The Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 2008

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on May 7, 2008, 19:35:31 (webmaster), with revision saved on October 21, 2008, 19:39:16 (webmaster):

H.R. 5057 would reauthorize the Debbie Smith DNA Backlog Grant Program.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the Senate on September 25, 2008. The summary of that version is repeated here.)</b>

Debbie Smith Reauthorization Act of 2008 - Amends the DNA Analysis Backlog Elimination Act of 2000 to authorize appropriations for DNA analysis grant programs under such Act through FY2014.

Amends the DNA Sexual Assault Justice Act of 2004 to reauthorize through FY2014 grant programs for: (1) DNA training and education for law enforcement and corrections personnel and court officers; and (2) the sexual assault forensic exam program.

</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 5/6/2008: House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Subcommittee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.9/30/2008: Presented to President.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(LogFindings and Purpose of the original bill:

1) Every 2 minutes, somewhere
in America, someone is sexually assaulted.

(2) The Department of Justice reports that in the year 2000, there were an estimated 261,000 rapes and sexual assaults.

(3) The annual National Crime Victimization study consistently finds that only about one-third of rapes in the United States are reported.

(4) According
to edit the wikiBureau of Justice Statistics of the Department of Justice, in the year 2000, 34 percent of female victims of rape or sexual assault reported that the offender was a stranger.

(5) According to the Department of Justice, DNA evidence is often recovered from crime scenes
and can be crucial to the firstinvestigation of sexual assaults and other violent crimes.

(6) According
to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead
Department of Justice, the importance of the role forensic DNA evidence plays in solving sexual assault and take outhomicide cases cannot be overstated.

(7) A DNA profile from a crime scene can be entered into
the sentenceCombined DNA Index System of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (known as CODIS), which allows agencies to match DNA profiles with other profiles entered into local, State, and national databases to identify a suspect or link serial crimes.

(8) A 1999 study commissioned by the National Institute of Justice estimated there was an annual backlog of 180,000 rape kits that have not been analyzed, and news reports indicate that the number of rape kits
in parentheses,the backlog may be as high as 500,000.

(9) Law enforcement officials using CODIS have matched unknown DNA evidence taken from crime scenes with known offender DNA profiles in the State
and national DNA database 2,371 times.

(10) At least 100 inmates have been cleared and freed to date due to DNA testing.

(11) By convicting the guilty and freeing the innocent, DNA evidence truly serves the interests of justice.

(b) PURPOSE- The purpose of
this notice! -->Act is to provide adequate funding to ensure that the backlog of unanalyzed rape kits is eliminated.

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

From the Blog

A Swarm of New Laws

Our “Silly Season” series of posts featured the laws racing across the House floor in the waning days of Congress’ regular session. Now it’s time to see what bills were passed into law. Mind you, not all of them are silly. B...

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

Entrench

July 11, 2008, 9:56am (report abuse)

Normally I am against additional expenditure given our current volume of debt, however I view this as a necessary expenditure. Innovations in DNA technology greatly expand our ability to catch predators and other violent criminals. As a matter of fact it was the recent innovation of so called "touch DNA" that allowed us to finally clear the parents of Jon Benet Ramsey of any wrong doing.

tedbohne

October 18, 2008, 8:40am (report abuse)

i agree with 'entrench.'

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)