Home

Blog

How People Voted

26% For, 74% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 4828, The Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site Boundary Expansion Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on September 25, 2008, 07:41:30 (webmaster), with revision saved on November 13, 2008, 19:42:04 (webmaster):

H.R. 4828 would amend the Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site Act of 1991 to expand the boundaries of the historic site.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic SiteHistorical Park Boundary Expansion and Redesignation Act of 20072008 - AmendsRedesignates the Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site (located in Brownsville, Texas, and dedicated to the preservation and interpretation of the Mexican-American War) as the &quot;Palo Alto Battlefield National Park. &quot;

Amends
the Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site Act of 1991 to expand the boundaries of the Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site to include certain land.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 9/24/2008: Passed/agreed to9/25/2008: Received in House. Status: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.Senate.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)