Home

Blog

How People Voted

20% For, 80% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

P.L. 110-133, The Asian Elephant Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2007

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing revision saved on October 10, 2007, 17:53:03 (webmaster), with revision saved on October 30, 2007, 19:37:11 (webmaster):

H.R. 465 would reauthorize the Asian Elephant Conservation Act of 1997.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
<b>(This measure has not been amended since it was passed by the House on July, 23 2007. The summary of that version is repeated here.)</b>





Asian Elephant Conservation Reauthorization Act of 2007 - Amends the Asian Elephant Conservation Act of 1997 to: (1) authorize appropriations for FY2007-FY2012 for such Act; (2) increase the amount that may be used for administrative expenses to carry out such Act; and (3) repeal provisions requiring the Secretary of the Interior to notify countries regarding the approval of conservation projects for Asian elephants.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 8/2/2007: Placed10/29/2007: By Senator Boxer from Committee on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. CalendarEnvironment and Public Works filed written report. Report No. 323.110-212.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)