How People Voted
 |
 |
17% For, 83% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 4180, To allow United States citizens to bring civil actions against persons who fail to perform an act or duty under the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on November 15, 2007, 18:30:24 (webmaster):
H.R. 4180 would allow United States citizens to bring civil actions against persons who fail to perform an act or duty under the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
(Log inLatest Major Action: 11/14/2007: Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to edit the wikiCommittee on Ways and beMeans, and in addition to the firstCommittee on the Judiciary, for a period to updatebe subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the statusjurisdiction of the bill!)committee concerned.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Robert C. Brown
December 5, 2007, 12:37pm (report abuse)This bill is a serious attempt to further encroach on Peru's sovereignty. If enacted, a U.S. citizen (or corporation) would be able to sure Peru or any Peruvian citizen or entity for violating the "Free Trade" Agreement. This means, if the Peruvian government decides to uphold national environmental standards or set a minimum wage, they could be sued under U.S. law (NOT international or Peruvian law!). We saw a similar case to this hypothetical one in Costa Rica a few years back when Harken, a Texas based oil company, attempted to sue the Costa Rican government for upholding environmental standards in regards to oil speculation and extraction for more then their yearly G.D.P. If CAFTA (similar to the Peru Free Trade Agreement) had been in effect in Costa Rica, as it is now, this lawsuit very well could have been won.