How People Voted
 |
 |
17% For, 83% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 4180, To allow United States citizens to bring civil actions against persons who fail to perform an act or duty under the United States-Peru Trade Promotion Agreement Implementation Act
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Revision History 
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Robert C. Brown
December 5, 2007, 12:37pm (report abuse)This bill is a serious attempt to further encroach on Peru's sovereignty. If enacted, a U.S. citizen (or corporation) would be able to sure Peru or any Peruvian citizen or entity for violating the "Free Trade" Agreement. This means, if the Peruvian government decides to uphold national environmental standards or set a minimum wage, they could be sued under U.S. law (NOT international or Peruvian law!). We saw a similar case to this hypothetical one in Costa Rica a few years back when Harken, a Texas based oil company, attempted to sue the Costa Rican government for upholding environmental standards in regards to oil speculation and extraction for more then their yearly G.D.P. If CAFTA (similar to the Peru Free Trade Agreement) had been in effect in Costa Rica, as it is now, this lawsuit very well could have been won.