Home

Blog

How People Voted

33% For, 67% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 3849, The Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance Act

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
  • This bill, or a similar bill, was reintroduced in the current Congress as H.R. 601, The Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance Act.

Comparing revision saved on July 11, 2008, 19:47:11 (webmaster), with revision saved on July 18, 2008, 19:46:22 (webmaster):

H.R. 3849 would provide for the conveyance of parcels of land to Mantua, Box Elder County, Utah.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Box Elder Utah Land Conveyance Act - Directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the city of Mantua, Utah, all interest of the United States in and to the parcels of National Forest System land in Box Elder County that are labeled as parcels A, B, and C.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 7/10/2008:7/16/2008: House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Subcommittee Hearings Held.Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)