How People Voted
11% For, 89% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 3778, The HOMES Act
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Below is the revision history of this article.
(Learn how to edit the WashingtonWatch.com wiki.)
(Latest | Earliest)
To look at a past version, click on its date. To compare any two versions, select their radio buttons and click on "Compare Selected Versions." To compare a past version with the current version, click on (cur). To compare a version with the preceding version, click on (last).
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)





Visitor Comments
Jim
December 13, 2007, 10:20pm (report abuse)This bill does sound like it will help out people like myself who face loans which endanger their ability to restructure their mortgages and possibly completing a successful Chapter 13 plan, HR 3609 is written to address the problem to a higher degree and with less limitation. This legislation would possible help me deal with our situation and reduce the impact of the mortgage emergency for non-prime loans.
Jim
December 17, 2007, 7:53pm (report abuse)After reviewing this bill I realized that the first person would have 150% of median. If 2 to 4 people were in the houshold the median income would be used.
Most people, except myself would file chapter 7 if we were below median income. You almost got me to believe you on this one. It covers absolutely no-one in chapter 13.