How People Voted
16% For, 84% Against
Take Action
![]() ![]() |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
![]() ![]() |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
| del.icio.us | |
| Digg | |
| Yahoo! | |
H.R. 356, To remove certain restrictions on the Mammoth Community Water District's ability to use certain property acquired by that District from the United States
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing revision saved on January 24, 2008, 19:53:28 (webmaster), with revision saved on July 24, 2008, 20:03:35 (webmaster):
H.R. 356 would remove certain restrictions on the Mammoth Community Water District's ability to use certain property acquired by that District from the United States.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
Allows specified landAuthorizes use of approximately 36.25 acres patented to the Mammoth County Water District (now known as the Mammoth Community Water District) in Mono County, California, to be: (1) used for purposes other thanany public purpose, notwithstanding the purpose for which the land was being used prior to conveyance to the District; and (2) transferred as authorized under state law.Sisk Act.
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
Latest Major Action: 7/25/2007: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee6/16/2008: Placed on Energy and Natural Resources. Date of scheduled consideration. SD-366. 11:30 a.m.Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 809.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)




Visitor Comments
There are currently no comments for this bill.