Home

Blog

How People Voted

16% For, 84% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 356, To remove certain restrictions on the Mammoth Community Water District's ability to use certain property acquired by that District from the United States

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.

Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on January 24, 2008, 19:53:28 (webmaster):

H.R. 356 would remove certain restrictions on the Mammoth Community Water District's ability to use certain property acquired by that District from the United States.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Allows specified land patented to the Mammoth County Water District (now known as the Mammoth Community Water District) in Mono County, California, to be: (1) used for purposes other than the purpose for which the land was being used prior to conveyance to the District; and (2) transferred as authorized under state law.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 5/3/2007:7/25/2007: Senate committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Committee Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Senate Subcommittee on Public Lands and Forests . Hearings held.Resources. Date of scheduled consideration. SD-366. 11:30 a.m.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)