Home

Blog

How People Voted

15% For, 85% Against

Take Action

Alert Your Friends and Colleagues
Write Your Representative in Congress
Save & Share
del.icio.us
Digg
Facebook
Google
Reddit
Yahoo!

H.R. 3473, The Bountiful City Land Consolidation Act

  • This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
  • This bill, or a similar bill, was reintroduced in the current Congress as H.R. 604, The Bountiful City Land Consolidation Act.

Comparing revision saved on February 14, 2008, 19:21:07 (webmaster), with revision saved on February 29, 2008, 19:21:48 (webmaster):

H.R. 3473 would provide for a land exchange with the City of Bountiful, Utah, involving National Forest System land in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest and to further land ownership consolidation in that national forest.

== Detailed Summary ==

<summary>
Bountiful City Land Consolidation Act - Allows the city of Bountiful, Utah, to acquire specified National Forest System land in the Wasatch-Cache National Forest, a part of which is used under permit for a shooting range, in exchange for the city conveying certain lands in Bountiful to the United States through the Secretary of Agriculture.
</summary>

<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Status of the Legislation ==

<status>
Latest Major Action: 2/13/2008: House committee/subcommittee actions. Status: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.2/28/2008: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 325.
</status>

<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->

== Points in Favor ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

== Points Against ==

(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->

« Return to Revision History.


Cost per :

Learn More

Visitor Comments Comments Feed for This Bill

There are currently no comments for this bill.

RSS Feeds for This Bill

Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)