How People Voted
 |
 |
36% For, 64% Against
Take Action
  |
Alert Your Friends and Colleagues |
  |
Write Your Representative in Congress |
| Save & Share | |
 |
del.icio.us |
 |
Digg |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
Yahoo! |
H.R. 3437, The Jackson Gulch Rehabilitation Act of 2007
- This item is from the 110th Congress (2007-2008) and is no longer current. Comments, voting, and wiki editing have been disabled, and the cost/savings estimate has been frozen.
Comparing original version (created by webmaster) with revision saved on August 4, 2007, 18:27:56 (webmaster):
H.R. 3437 would authorize the Secretary of the Interior to carry out the Jackson Gulch rehabilitation project in the State of Colorado.
== Detailed Summary ==
<summary>
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to provide a detailed summary of the bill!)
</summary>
<!--Leave in the 'summary' tags if you want the latest summary from the Congressional Research Service automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Status of the Legislation ==
<status>
(Log inLatest Major Action: 8/3/2007: Referred to edit the wiki and be the firstHouse committee. Status: Referred to update the status of the bill!)House Committee on Natural Resources.
</status>
<!-- Leave in the 'status' tags if you want the latest reported status from THOMAS automatically to replace the text between the tags once it becomes available. -->
== Points in Favor ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
== Points Against ==
(Log in to edit the wiki and be the first to show why the bill should not pass!)
<!-- First editor: Go ahead and take out the sentence in parentheses, and this notice! -->
Cost per :
Learn More
RSS Feeds for This Bill
Keep yourself updated on user contributions and debates about this bill! (Learn more about RSS.)
Visitor Comments
Bretta
July 29, 2008, 6:01pm (report abuse)The cost stated today seems minicule... but it is an ESTIMATE.
and no doubt I will be thought stingy, but it is these LITTLE(?)amounts that continually add up to BIG amounts. Is everything that's proposed really necessary? Or is it a congressman championing for re-election?
Martin
July 31, 2008, 8:50pm (report abuse)No offense to Coloradans, but I don't pay taxes to fix other states gulches.